OFFICIAL Lachlan Galvin #277 *Released* Career Discussion.

The club statement says otherwise. Too many emotions flowing on here. We have two years with a quality developing spine, including Galvin.
Well, I think that Richo has been in enough situations like this to know when Galvin isn't being straight. There's wanting to go to market, and there's wanting to go to market. When we have cards in our hand like Latu, you don't play games with a player that has a foot out the door. Look at what happened with Stefano - we let him go and picked up Terrell, a player that genuinely wants to play at the Tigers.

It's a shame as I think his shifty manager is clearly in his ear, but I honestly think that after a few games with Latu and Laui playing together I don't think we lose much. The reason our spine so so effective is the multiple threats of Api, Bula, Laui and Galvin/Fainu.
 
Seems to me his manager has got an offer elsewhere already. Any club paying him more than $1m is risking a cap disaster- i can’t see him playing in the halves for too many years.
However unlike others I worry about Latu’s resilience and his fitness to be a reliable half week in week out.
Richo is a master at this- I’m happy to sit back and watch the next development in this saga unfold as there’s bound to be more to come.
 
Never for dropping your best players but don't see any reason now to persist with Lachy in FG unless we are riddled with injury.
I'd rather go with Mason if Latu is not fit even Douehi and put Naden in the centres
To put it bluntly, our backrow is garbage. Twal and Seyfarth are honest toilers, nothing more. Galvin could be an excellent stopgap until we recruit a replacement or one of our juniors like Phoenix Godinet is ready for first grade.
 
You don't punish Galvin for signing elsewhere- that opens the club up for questions of bias & isn't a good look for the players at the club for future contract deals.

You let Galvin's play determine if he's in 1st grade or not.

If he plays well- you pick him.

If he is outplayed- you pick the guy that outplays him.

It is now up to Galvin as to what grade he plays. I wouldn't even consider releasing him. If he rides the KOE pine, he's not sinking the club's salary cap. He doesn't have that hanging over the club.

It's in his best interest to play well.

But now the leash is short, and there are options if he doesn't perform.
 
To put it bluntly, our backrow is garbage. Twal and Seyfarth are honest toilers, nothing more. Galvin could be an excellent stopgap until we recruit a replacement or one of our juniors like Phoenix Godinet is ready for first grade.
Galvin's defence is poor, at best.

I've advocated for shifting Galvin. But he's not ready yet.
 
Can’t say I have seen a club announce a player’s departure six months before they are free to negotiate with another club. He and his family must have some serious contempt for this club. Might as well drop him now. Who cares.
Agree , I feel his parents are heavily involved and have been swept of there feet by a Gould or Politis , Galvin has a deal like I mentioned last week , 5 years x $ 1 million with all the other behind the scenes stuff , back to reserve grade now , we need players who are committed to the club and team Galvin is not one of those players , drop the guy today , and if he is on $ 250 then $ 350. Keep him there , he can warm the pine in reserve grade , Latu now needs to be given the same chance Galvin got
 
He will be if he picks up a serious injury before this season is through. An ACL or torn pec would destroy his value for next season. Not to mention if it’s a Tuiaki or Alex McKinnon type injury. You never know. It’s idiotic to sit on so much money when this occupation is one that could be taken from you in the blink of an eye.
Yeah agree...but i was talking about isaac moses....if every club boycotted him...his clients would go elsewhere and hed be screwed
 
You don't punish Galvin for signing elsewhere- that opens the club up for questions of bias & isn't a good look for the players at the club for future contract deals.

You let Galvin's play determine if he's in 1st grade or not.

If he plays well- you pick him.

If he is outplayed- you pick the guy that outplays him.

It is now up to Galvin as to what grade he plays. I wouldn't even consider releasing him. If he rides the KOE pine, he's not sinking the club's salary cap. He doesn't have that hanging over the club.

It's in his best interest to play well.

But now the leash is short, and there are options if he doesn't perform.
It's not punishing him, it's doing the best thing for the club. How does it make sense for the tigers to continue to develop him when we have another option that is up to it and needs development? He made he call, he knows the potential consequences.
 
Back
Top