Kelce68
Well-known member
Haha, what?A contrarian would come into a thread like the Galvin thread and completely blow it up by defending him, saying he’s better off without the club. Yada yada yada. If you can find an instance where I have done that, go for it. That would be an example of saying something for the sake of it. There’s no opinion I give that I can’t justify or rationalise. I just take emotion out of the equation most of the time, which a lot of others don’t do at times. And because they can’t, they immediately think anything slightly left of status quo means you are against them or trying to rile them up. Forums like this are for die hards, so it’s no surprise they just accuse you of trying to get a reaction when you look at things from a different perspective.
The moment you are shown, in a straightforward and logical manner, that your argument is incorrect or misguided, you ghost the conversation.
You partially float around to snipe in silly, contrarian comments then disappear into the wind when pushed to legitimise what you're saying.
You also post well too, which I have no trouble with supporting or agreeing with.
But you're a contrarian through and through. You're welcome to better back up your arguments with evidence in the future if you don't like my subjective, completely irrelevant assessment.
Last edited: