Chammas Article

I've seen the comments, some indirect, some not so subtle.
I've been called a "richard" which we all know is shorthand for something else.
No name used of course, just enough for me to "assume".

I've also seen someone say... I spend half my time on here bagging him.
Again, no name used, just enough for me to "assume".

And I'm the one labelled deluded, manipulative and playing the victim.

Let me be clear'
I've never resorted to name calling.
I've never asked for a return to 2000.
I've consistently advocated for balance, fairness and representation.
So, if some people think this is too much to ask to bring unity, then I think there is a strong case of branding bias.

If that's delusion, then I'll wear it proudly.

And when some posters resort to cheap shots instead of educating, Imo it says more about their insecurity than my intent.

I'm not here to bag anyone.
 
I've seen the comments, some indirect, some not so subtle.
I've been called a "richard" which we all know is shorthand for something else.
No name used of course, just enough for me to "assume".

I've also seen someone say... I spend half my time on here bagging him.
Again, no name used, just enough for me to "assume".

And I'm the one labelled deluded, manipulative and playing the victim.

Let me be clear'
I've never resorted to name calling.
I've never asked for a return to 2000.
I've consistently advocated for balance, fairness and representation.
So, if some people think this is too much to ask to bring unity, then I think there is a strong case of branding bias.

If that's delusion, then I'll wear it proudly.

And when some posters resort to cheap shots instead of educating, Imo it says more about their insecurity than my intent.

I'm not here to bag anyone.
LOL
 
I suggest he stops stalking me. You don’t know the context so stay out of it please.
Dude you write multiple posts a day. People will respond to you. Look at his post numbers. He posts multiple times a day a
too and has done since I joined 27 years ago. Perception and reality...
 
Lol, we should call it out tbh.

There’s a deep state anti-magpie element in the club who need to be weeded out and interrogated about how they could find themselves on the wrong side of history.

And what’s more, their hard man questioner should be wearing the colours of the Balmain Tigers.

There is no lonely singularity in the words “joint venture” my learned friend.
Seems more like an anti Balmain sentiment coming from a backslapping few to me.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top