That is typical AD play though - if he is on the ball he can be fantastic. It is what he doesn't do off the ball that is his limiting factor. Rewatch last weekends game and focus on him off the ball - the difference between the left and right side line speed is telling. Luai and his edge is pushing up and in to contain the Dogs whereas AD in his edge is not. This could be planned (but I doubt it). Look at his kick chase efforts, look at the inside pressure that he doesn't provide.
I'm not saying he is a bad player at all. He has done some great things but the offer he has been given reflects how he will fit into the team going forward. Benji is trying to deliver an effort focussed team and is rewarding this with game time (Seyfarth/Twal etc). I can only imagine that the plan is to get more of these types, with hgher ceilings, than to have those that like to shine when the focus is on them but don't do the extras.
The Dogs, until we humiliated them, were thriving on this model because of the work done in the effort areas. On the weekend we won because of our control, effort areas and a couple of fortuitous bounces and slips that went our way. Wests of old don't win those games.
AD has put a case forward, and has a place in the team no doubt. However, his lack of effort off the ball has clearly been noticed by those that matter. If he can pick that up, like he has with his tackling deficiencies, he can be a great player. History and current performances suggests that he doesn't have it in him. He can be a good starter at a middle tier club or he can be a great 14/depth player at Wests Tigers and be part of the ride.
He is not lost though, if Benji is true to his word and has had the hard conversation, AD knows why he has been offered the $ and what he needs to do to get more.