The NRL is set to threaten potential salary-cap penalties against any club attempting to publicly court rival players before they become a free agent, in a shake up to the game's anti-tampering laws.
In what looms as a significant change to the NRL's contracting rules, clubs and their officials will be banned from making comment about pursuing players not yet on the market.
The changes come after a year of contract drama, headlined by Lachlan Galvin's mid-season move from Wests Tigers to Canterbury with 17 months left on his original contract.
Under current NRL rules, players and their agents are not able to negotiate with rival clubs until the final season of their contract starts on November 1 each year.
But it has become apparent clubs have at times moved to signal their interest in players via the media well before then.
Phil Gould's roles as Bulldogs boss and media commentator sparked concern in the Galvin transfer. (Dave Hunt/AAP PHOTOS)
In turn, there is a belief this can influence players to not re-sign with their current clubs early, knowing interest from several parties could ramp up a bidding war.
Beyond the threat of salary cap sanctions, it is understood the NRL will be able to fine or even deregister club officials who flaunt the new rule
Canterbury general manager Phil Gould was accused of using his position in the media to publicly court Galvin this year, before the Tigers gave him permission to look elsewhere.
As far back as last August Gould predicted Galvin would "earn more money out of rugby league than any other player in history", labelling him "the best teenage footballer" he'd ever seen.
Gould later claimed it was "untenable" for Galvin to stay at the Tigers after knocking back an extension at the club, before the young half was eventually released to join Canterbury.
The Bulldogs supremo had always maintained a public position of having not yet spoken to Galvin, but his comments still raised the eyebrows of other clubs.
That matter prompted a push for tougher rules around the issue, which are now expected to come into existence this summer.
Payne Haas is another player whose contractual future has cast a spotlight on transfer laws. (Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS)
It's understood the changes to the rules have been undertaken in conjunction with the NRL and players' union, as part of a commitment to review anti-tampering laws in the last collective bargaining agreement.
The Galvin situation is far from the only time when officials have been accused of making a public play for a big-name player before they can legally open negotiations on November 1.
Several clubs this season made no secret of their desire to land Payne Haas for 2027, despite the Brisbane prop only becoming a free agent last weekend.
Under the new rules, this would also no longer be allowed.
Haas is yet to re-sign with Brisbane, but is not expected to be lured out of Queensland given his family situation in the area.
The game's other anti-tampering rules will continue to apply, including rival clubs not being able to negotiate with a player's agent until the final year of their contract.
Clubs are also unable to approach a rival team to enquire about their interest in a player being moved on to them, without seeking the player's permission first.
