HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Status
Not open for further replies.
View attachment 31474
Everyone making circular arguments...the proof of incompetence is there for all to see straight from the statement HBG delivered...so what is it, the board are rubbish so we sacked them? (then re-instated them) Richo is corrupt so we endorsed him? We sacked the board so Richo would resign because he was not corrupt enough for us to sack him, he was doing his job, however we got upset about a few decisions he made so we sacked the board......there is no 4th, 5th, 6th or whatever chance we are now up to as justification to leave these guys in charge. That horse bolted years ago. (BTW the statement is still live online if you use the link....again...incompetence)
Yeah 100%. Either they are lying about richo, or that they've had an issue at the board but reinstated the directors.

Or.... this is a pure power play focused on their own egos.

Either one of these angles suggests they are incompetent, lying or just plain naracists doing the wrong thing by the club and members.
 
Plenty on here have been talking about "going back" to a Wests Ts NSW Cup team - which was what my answer was addressing.

And yes, I'll have a crack at the unhinged, bigots who seem to think that anything associated with wearing black & white is akin to supporting the Stasi.

Get a grip people - Its Christmas time ... Joy to the World etc etc
We have been wearing Black and White for 25 years they are our colours. The colour that seems to be the one that people have a problem is not black or white.
 
I don't know Suzie from a bar of soap.. but you have attacked someone who helps keep this forum running; I assume without any pay... She is entitled to her opinion as much as the next person, moderator or not.
There's a huge difference between attacking someone and criticizing them.
Criticizing is OK yeah? Stepping outside the groupthink, that's permitted, isnt it?

This is footy mate.
In the grand scheme of things, it matters little.
I'm not going to attack anyone on a footy club forum.
But I will point out obvious agendas. Especially when they're being propagated by an admin

PS - Nice use of the Bold key
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
Ok, so why aren't you holding people to account when they have obvious agendas in relation to the HBG?


Thanks. I learnt it from your mate.
Firstly, there are no admins with a pro-HBG agenda.
And secondly, the vast majority of posters on the forum bleat loudly from within the anti HBG holding pen. I've never been one to ride the wave of zealotry. To hear an alternate view, while perceived as threatening by some of the more fragile among us, is good for the soul.
 
Plenty on here have been talking about "going back" to a Wests Ts NSW Cup team - which was what my answer was addressing.

And yes, I'll have a crack at the unhinged, bigots who seem to think that anything associated with wearing black & white is akin to supporting the Stasi.

Get a grip people - Its Christmas time ... Joy to the World etc etc
Thank God for the likes of the HBG who have made my Christmas such a joyous occasion.

NO NO NO MERRY CHRISTMAS!
 
Considering we
won 9 games.
New squad
Galvin leaves with drama mid-season
1st year of board/richo working together
Campbelltown/Leichhardt funding deals done

Previous years wins
6, 4, 4

If that's negligible, then OK 👍
The difference between a "Wests Tigers" reserve grade team (2013-2016)
& a Western Suburbs Reserve Grade (2017 on) team has been negligible.

I always find its good to match your response to the topic of the post your responding to.

OK👍
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BZN
Firstly, there are no admins with a pro-HBG agenda.
How does having an opinion on HBG make it an agenda? Why does it matter if she's admin? Can admins not have an opinion?

Do you hold the Wests Magpie forum leaders to the same account? Paul Stamo is one of the most toxic voices within the Wests tigers fan group and is consistently driving division amongst Wests tigers fans.

And secondly, the vast majority of posters on the forum bleat loudly from within the anti HBG holding pen. I've never been one to ride the wave of zealotry. To hear an alternate view, while perceived as threatening by some of the more fragile among us, is good for the soul.
I'm very open to alternative views, I have been trying to get into a discussion with peoplle like yourself since this kicked off..

The thing is, it isn't a discussion when one side refuses to answer completely reasonable questions..

So why won't you lot engage in an open and fair discussion if it's so good for the souL? You just prefer to point fingers and argue than to address the serious questions.
 
There's a huge difference between attacking someone and criticizing them.
Criticizing is OK yeah? Stepping outside the groupthink, that's permitted, isnt it?

This is footy mate.
In the grand scheme of things, it matters little.
I'm not going to attack anyone on a footy club forum.
But I will point out obvious agendas. Especially when they're being propagated by an admin

PS - Nice use of the Bold key
Great posts B2T.
I hope I haven't started something where every 🤡 uses the BOLD key for every 2nd word.


Theres only one 🤡 on here allowed to do that.
 
The difference between a "Wests Tigers" reserve grade team (2013-2016)
& a Western Suburbs Reserve Grade (2017 on) team has been negligible.

I always find its good to match your response to the topic of the post your responding to.

OK👍
Same could be said about you. I was talking about the NRL team because that is all that matters.

This reserve grade side show just distracts from that, but I don't think anyone made the argument that a WT reserve grade side would get better results based on a name change.

It's a history vs brand alignment argument they are making, but you've shifted the framing to results to make a point that it has no impact therefore should be Magpies.
 
How does having an opinion on HBG make it an agenda? Why does it matter if she's admin? Can admins not have an opinion?

Do you hold the Wests Magpie forum leaders to the same account? Paul Stamo is one of the most toxic voices within the Wests tigers fan group and is consistently driving division amongst Wests tigers fans.


I'm very open to alternative views, I have been trying to get into a discussion with peoplle like yourself since this kicked off..

The thing is, it isn't a discussion when one side refuses to answer completely reasonable questions..

So why won't you lot engage in an open and fair discussion if it's so good for the souL? You just prefer to point fingers and argue than to address the serious questions.
Everyone has opinions. But there's a huge difference between an admin having an opinion and an admin having an agenda.

I have nothing to do with any Wests Magpie forum.

I don't know Paul Stamo.

Not sure who my lot are supposed to be - I'm my own man - a veritable army of one 🤣
 
Same could be said about you. I was talking about the NRL team because that is all that matters.

This reserve grade side show just distracts from that, but I don't think anyone made the argument that a WT reserve grade side would get better results based on a name change.

It's a history vs brand alignment argument they are making, but you've shifted the framing to results to make a point that it has no impact therefore should be Magpies.
Well you've changed your tune.
You used to be all about results, & judging a blokes worth on how many first grade games he'd played ...

Brand alignment ???
What toss.
Weasel word jibberish.
How does that impact anything - except make one of two OCD sufferers feel less anxious ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BZN
Where does an opinion finsh and an agenda begin?
Yeah, fair point.

I guess agendas become more apparent when one disagrees with the case being so relentlessly prosecuted.

Suzie’s comments, and more obviously what she chooses to like or doesn't like are pretty stark indicators. The other admins don't suffer from this IMHO
 
  • Love
Reactions: BZN
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top