HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

Status
Not open for further replies.

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Blah blah blah.
It’s a despicable attempt to question someone’s character ONLY because of his association with Wests Magpies and HBG.
Contrary to belief not everyone involved is anti Wests Tigers and at least some are wanting and hoping to obtain more power to strengthen the ties and make the relationship better.
It’s just assumed that everybody involved in these organisations have the exact same mindset when that is not correct.
You really need to understand. The relationship is not important [I assume you mean with Balmain]. Balmain have a mini stake in this and frankly have no power/easily vetoed.

It's about the decisions in relation to WT and in this case, unwanted media attention. Hate to say I told you so, but...I told you so. Not everyone was going to see it as a little joke.
 
Blah blah blah.
It’s a despicable attempt to question someone’s character ONLY because of his association with Wests Magpies and HBG.
Contrary to belief not everyone involved is anti Wests Tigers and at least some are wanting and hoping to obtain more power to strengthen the ties and make the relationship better.
It’s just assumed that everybody involved in these organisations have the exact same mindset when that is not correct.
Blah blah blah??? 🤣 🤣 🤣

Quite a response there

More in line with those these days that take no responsibilty for anything, its always someone elses fault
Didnt think you were of that bracket V
 
Blah blah blah.
It’s a despicable attempt to question someone’s character ONLY because of his association with Wests Magpies and HBG.
Contrary to belief not everyone involved is anti Wests Tigers and at least some are wanting and hoping to obtain more power to strengthen the ties and make the relationship better.
It’s just assumed that everybody involved in these organisations have the exact same mindset when that is not correct.
He made a bad social media post and is facing consequences for it, no matter how you try and spin it
 
You really need to understand. The relationship is not important [I assume you mean with Balmain]. Balmain have a mini stake in this and frankly have no power/easily vetoed.

It's about the decisions in relation to WT and in this case, unwanted media attention. Hate to say I told you so, but...I told you so. Not everyone was going to see it as a little joke.
There is a far bigger picture and far more important things needing to resolved than the over reaction of trouble makes in relation to a social media photo which has been shared as a joke by countless people.
 
He made a bad social media post and is facing consequences for it, no matter how you try and spin it
There’s no spin, I’m pointing out that jumping on a bandwagon and trying to get this person into trouble is not a good thing for Wests Tigers.
But if you like others want to get involved without really knowing what’s going on, then keep doing it.
 
Ok let’s just keep the people who people who are not so pro Wests Tigers involved.
Ink you are honestly getting easier manipulated the older you get.
Please do some proper research before commenting,
Thanks V
I asked you politely to educate us on how much a supporter of WTs Fallah is.. but all you can come back with is personal abuse (i saw your post before you edited it)

I guess you cant show us his support...not surprised
 
There’s no spin, I’m pointing out that getting this person into trouble is not a good thing for Wests Tigers.
But if you like others want to get involved without really knowing what’s going on, then keep doing it.
Then it's on HBG and the group to give the transparency. Yes, we honestly have no idea if he's a good bloke, a hard worker, or will push for WT.

But his social media posts, particularly the aggressive one on the march, skew pretty far the other way. How are supporters here supposed to know? You can't put it on them.

There is absolutely no transparency from this mob and when there is, it's bad stuff. You were even criticizing people for reading the little output we can on social media as "stalking"
 
There is a far bigger picture and far more important things needing to resolved than the over reaction of trouble makes in relation to a social media photo which has been shared as a joke by countless people.
No one made the trouble. The NSWRL picked it up and issued a please explain.

You can't look at one guy. You need to extrapolate the behaviour to the whole league. If it's ok for him, it has to be ok for all club board members.

Now imagine all clubs were sharing this type of thing through their board members...it wouldn't be a good look at all. Thankfully, the NSWRL has some common sense and is putting an end to it.

It doesn't matter how many people shared it. They have no obligation of behaviour to NSWRL. It's irrelevant.
 
Then it's on HBG and the group to give the transparency. Yes, we honestly have no idea if he's a good bloke, a hard worker, or will push for WT.

But his social media posts, particularly the aggressive one on the march, skew pretty far the other way. How are supporters here supposed to know? You can't put it on them.

There is absolutely no transparency from this mob and when there is, it's bad stuff. You were even criticizing people for reading the little output we can on social media as "stalking"
Agree with you mate.

Also, would you see childish or immature posts being posted by Mark Bouris or Luke Ricketson et al from the Roosters I don't think so.

That is why some clubs are much better managed than others.
 
Keep it.going....youre digging yourself into a big hole
I’m digging myself into a hole ?
I find it astonishing that someone with your life experience is so gullible and honestly believe that every single person involved with Wests Magpies or HBG thinks exactly the same way and have exactly the same point of view.
I find it even more astonishing that you do not know and facts, do not want to make any effort to know any facts, but are still happy to jump on a bandwagon that causes unnecessary trouble and does not benefit Wests Tigers in any way.
 
I’m digging myself into a hole ?
I find it astonishing that someone with your life experience is so gullible and honestly believe that every single person involved with Wests Magpies or HBG thinks exactly the same way and have exactly the same point of view.
I find it even more astonishing that you do not know and facts, do not want to make any effort to know any facts, but are still happy to jump on a bandwagon that causes unnecessary trouble and does not benefit Wests Tigers in any way.
You are Starting to.play the man and not the ball V.
Youve been asked numerous times this morning to give us facts.but you dance around the issue
You called me dumb earlier...now gullible...

Im not dumb nor gullible.its clear as day what youre doing...defending the indefensible
Im sure your 'mate' is a good bloke but the Magpies need better in a position of leadership...maybe he could man the BBQ or fill the sauce bottles, pump up the balls etc.

I find it amusing you were telling us ad nauseam last week its not a Wests tigers issue.... but now Fallah is suddenly a huge WTs advocate and suppprter.
You change with the wind Allan
 
You are Starting to.play the man and not the ball V.
Youve been asked numerous times this morning to give us facts.but you dance around the issue
You called me dumb earlier...now gullible...

Im not dumb nor gullible.its clear as day what youre doing...defending the indefensible
Im sure your 'mate' is a good bloke but the Magpies need better in a position of leadership...maybe he could man the BBQ or fill the sauce bottles, pump up the balls etc.

I find it amusing you were telling us ad nauseam last week its not a Wests tigers issue.... but now Fallah is suddenly a huge WTs advocate and suppprter.
You change with the wind Allan
He is not a close mate.
I just happen to know he is a good man and not a problem in regards to Wests Tigers being prioritised as they should be moving forward.
There are some minor blockages, he’s not one of them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top