No, the whole argument is based on the fact that Tigers have been a basketcase loser side for 15 years and HBG have been the majority owners for most of that period.
Once you have sacked multiple coaches, replaced the roster a bunch of times, turned over the CEO and Chairman... at some point...
That's a pretty tired argument.
If you find yourself in the minority against a large number of voices, perhaps the "commonality" of sense has shifted away from you.
Richo certainly knew what he was doing - HBG desperate to have him as CEO, put in huge clauses to cover himself from a backstabbing, proven 100% correct.
I just wish I was a qualified sports management CEO, there might be a few more smart cookies about who could use HBG for a retirement top-up...
Have you seen the memes though? Pretty low-brow.
This is almost starting to sound like the Denny "I am not responsible for my own social media accounts" argument.
You literally said his comments (in a few days) are far more impressive than any CEO we've ever had.
Also 1.5M payout - that is in ADDITION to what we now have to pay the new guy. Not exactly a cost saving when you still have to pay out 75% of the original contract and then pay a new person on...
Depends when they played first grade.
Don't try and tell us that playing 100 games in 1985 has much reflection on how a modern fully professional first grade club is run today.