Don't know what your talking about there? Obviously something that doesn't suit your narrative. For a guy who talks like he knows all the answers that's a soft response.
Seems nobody likes to answer tough questions on here which don't suit them, they only like asking questions.
And you know...
Yeah probably why you laugh at my responses.
Blind Freddy can see people like you try to control the narrative and discourage alternative views.
That's why this forum is a bit suspicious really.
And by the way, I notice your moderators and others pushing for dropping the name Wests are still here and not called out.
Is this the official policy of this forum, because obviously there is alot of bias here?
Not really any different of people calling for the dropping of Tigers.
Not exactly clear that the haste with which to stand down the independants meant Wests Ashfield intended to move away from the independant model.
Vlandys arbitration of the matter siding with Wests Ashfield might mean more will come to light re why in coming days.
Certainly Vlandys decision...
That's the intention, and I think Flemington is profitable but they are many millions and years from breaking even I'm told.
I knew I shouldn't have gotten into this forum lol.
Need to stop .
It will be called Wests Tigers I believe.
For an entity planning a return of the magpies its certainly a funny approach that doesn't add up.
Vlandys knows.
Nearly 17 million I'm told has being spent on Balmain up to now and they will take on alot of risk and expense here I'm told.
Imagine if Balmain was financial all this money could go towards the Tigers.
According to HBG governance wasn't followed by Shane and the board hence the breach.
Any why did Barnier speak at the rally?
I thought that was really odd.