bomberbrown
Active member
Seyfarth should never have been in the situation. King laying all over him. If we get the penalty then the shoulder/head scenario wouldn't have eventuated.
AD value just went up
AD value just went up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
KPP is a solid signing and huge upgrade. Many underrate him but he’s on Sam Fainus level.Seyfarth and Sukkar really struggled to pick up yards when we were on the back foot. A few sets there we only picked up 15 metres.
Need better and Seyfarth could have cost us with his brain explosions. Always does something dumb.
He showed some mongrel with some of his runs this weekend. I was quite surprised.seems he doesn't possess any mongrel, will to win in him
If he's going to play like Samuela, then we'll all be happy next year.KPP is a solid signing and huge upgrade. Many underrate him but he’s on Sam Fainus level.
The difference was: one was innocuous and didn't advesly effect the attacking player, while the other was blatant and resulted in the attacking player leaving the field and not able to play for 11 days. If you asked anyone who watches the game to pick which one elicited a sin binning, 100% would pick the latter IMO. The fact that it was the opposite should be baffling but we all know why it isn't. Seyfarth is a known aggitator and easy to punish from a ref's perspective as he is not high profile. Crichton is their team captain and best player in an important position in a top 4 team. Add onto that the colour of the jerseys and unconscious bias that rules our refs the last few years and that should go some way in answering your question. 🙂A couple of calls went our way …particularly the two forwards passes that directly led to tries …
However … the non sin binning of Crichton like minutes after the Seyfarth sinbinning for literally the same thing is confusing … can anyone please help me to explain the difference in penalty in respect of the referees thinking ?
The difference was: one was innocuous and didn't advesly effect the attacking player, while the other was blatant and resulted in the attacking player leaving the field and not able to play for 11 days. If you asked anyone who watches the game to pick which one elicited a sin binning, 100% would pick the latter IMO. The fact that it was the opposite should be baffling but we all know why it isn't. Seyfarth is a known aggitator and easy to punish from a ref's perspective as he is not high profile. Crichton is their team captain and best player in an important position in a top 4 team. Add onto that the colour of the jerseys and unconscious bias that rules our refs the last few years and that should go some way in answering your question. 🙂
think KPP will fit into the system easy , Is he an upgrade - jury is outIf he's going to play like Samuela, then we'll all be happy next year.
Seyfarth is an experienced player now. When you lead by two tries in those conditions your discipline has to be better. He’s the first guy I’m cutting from our team. Along with To’a.Seyfarth should never have been in the situation. King laying all over him. If we get the penalty then the shoulder/head scenario wouldn't have eventuated.
AD value just went up
i do think teams target him to antagonise or know they will get away with more with him, but i agree has to be betterSeyfarth is an experienced player now. When you lead by two tries in those conditions your discipline has to be better. He’s the first guy I’m cutting from our team. Along with To’a.
Really not sure what he brings apart from (often misplaced) effort.i do think teams target him to antagonise or know they will get away with more with him, but i agree has to be better
Well it like this Crichton is a protected species, SOO , player , test player , so u can’t send him off , or GUS will see that u never ref again , I thinks thats it in a nut shellA couple of calls went our way …particularly the two forwards passes that directly led to tries …
However … the non sin binning of Crichton like minutes after the Seyfarth sinbinning for literally the same thing is confusing … can anyone please help me to explain the difference in penalty in respect of the referees thinking ?
You need to get to Specsavers M he's far better than the options for right side than what we have.think KPP will fit into the system easy , Is he an upgrade - jury is out
hip hip hoorayYou need to get to Specsavers M he's far better than the options for right side than what we have.
Can we have more opinion of the Seyfarth penalty before his sin binning.Seyfarth should never have been in the situation. King laying all over him. If we get the penalty then the shoulder/head scenario wouldn't have eventuated.
AD value just went up
No need to be pushing defenders in the face. You lead by 12 in the wet. A slow game is actually beneficial to us at that point.Can we have more opinion of the Seyfarth penalty before his sin binning.
Can we have more opinion of the Seyfarth penalty before his sin binning.
It was 2 or 3 clear pushes in the face. Sure you normally get away with it but why run the risk in that game situation??Alex got called out for infringing /undue contact to an oppositions head ?? ,what while he was fighting to get of his back to play the ball
that penalty was oursIt was 2 or 3 clear pushes in the face. Sure you normally get away with it but why run the risk in that game situation??