HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Status
Not open for further replies.
"These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?"

Other than the rather scandalous accusation, the fact that they were a problem at 50/50 was mitigated by the fact they were not majority board members.

The need for 'independent board members' hired by...the majority share holders...wasn't required.
 
The Chad said:
"These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?"

Other than the rather scandalous accusation, the fact that they were a problem at 50/50 was mitigated by the fact they were not majority board members.

The need for 'independent board members' hired by...the majority share holders...wasn't required.
Click to expand...
I think you need to do a bit more research, but I know you think you know...that's what I know
 
"Romero's downfall comes after a turbulent tenure. She not only removed her predecessor but also oversaw the departure of directors Rick Wayde and Dave Gilbert over the summer.

Tensions intensified when Romero opposed an independent governance review of the Wests Tigers following a hat-trick of wooden spoons - a review that was nonetheless conducted by respected administrators Tony Crawford and Gary Barnier.

That review ultimately handed power to CEO Shane Richardson, who has since implemented a number of its recommendations, reportedly to Romero's displeasure.

Her resistance to reform and the perception of internal obstruction may have cost her crucial boardroom support, culminating in this week's vote.

Burgess's elevation may be viewed with suspicion by some within the Balmain camp who fear a reassertion of Magpies control, despite the formal equal representation structure in place at the Wests Tigers board level."

Interesting that Romero got removed because she didn't want to implement to recommendations, but Burgess has them put into place.

"Burgess's appointment is already drawing scrutiny. According to the SMH, he reportedly told Balmain-aligned Wests Tigers director Danny Stapleton, “We're bringing back the Wests Magpies,” a comment that quickly caught fire behind closed doors and reached the desk of NRL chairman Peter V'landys via concerned Wests Tigers chair Barry O'Farrell."

“1000%. It was admitted to me directly by someone who is a director of the Magpies.
“The ultimate aim is to return the Magpies to the NRL.
“I know there were discussions not too long ago about extracting Balmain from the Wests Tigers and returning them to the State Cup.
“I was approached at the time and I said I had no interest in partaking as long as Danny Stapleton is the chair of Balmain. I don't trust the man and I don’t like the man."

Here we have 2 accounts of a similar story- bringing back the Magpies. One reported as being told to Danny Stapleton, the other recounted by Hagi who in the same statement says he doesn't trust Stapleton.

So....do we believe Stapleton? Or Hagi? Or neither? And if Romero gets removed & Burgess gives the go-ahead on the recommendations, does that mean Burgess agreed with the recommendations?
 
The Chad said:
True! I hope the new board members are awesome too.
Click to expand...
Why weren’t the previous WT board members awesome. Why did this whole debacle have to occur. Why did HBG CEO have to take down the club statement. Why are these circumstances on rinse and repeat with this ‘leadership’

If you keep doing the same thing and expect a different outcome …
 
The Chad said:
"Romero's downfall comes after a turbulent tenure. She not only removed her predecessor but also oversaw the departure of directors Rick Wayde and Dave Gilbert over the summer.

Tensions intensified when Romero opposed an independent governance review of the Wests Tigers following a hat-trick of wooden spoons - a review that was nonetheless conducted by respected administrators Tony Crawford and Gary Barnier.

That review ultimately handed power to CEO Shane Richardson, who has since implemented a number of its recommendations, reportedly to Romero's displeasure.

Her resistance to reform and the perception of internal obstruction may have cost her crucial boardroom support, culminating in this week's vote.

Burgess's elevation may be viewed with suspicion by some within the Balmain camp who fear a reassertion of Magpies control, despite the formal equal representation structure in place at the Wests Tigers board level."

Interesting that Romero got removed because she didn't want to implement to recommendations, but Burgess has them put into place.

"Burgess's appointment is already drawing scrutiny. According to the SMH, he reportedly told Balmain-aligned Wests Tigers director Danny Stapleton, “We're bringing back the Wests Magpies,” a comment that quickly caught fire behind closed doors and reached the desk of NRL chairman Peter V'landys via concerned Wests Tigers chair Barry O'Farrell."

“1000%. It was admitted to me directly by someone who is a director of the Magpies.
“The ultimate aim is to return the Magpies to the NRL.
“I know there were discussions not too long ago about extracting Balmain from the Wests Tigers and returning them to the State Cup.
“I was approached at the time and I said I had no interest in partaking as long as Danny Stapleton is the chair of Balmain. I don't trust the man and I don’t like the man."

Here we have 2 accounts of a similar story- bringing back the Magpies. One reported as being told to Danny Stapleton, the other recounted by Hagi who in the same statement says he doesn't trust Stapleton.

So....do we believe Stapleton? Or Hagi? Or neither? And if Romero gets removed & Burgess gives the go-ahead on the recommendations, does that mean Burgess agreed with the recommendations?
Click to expand...
Out of all the back stabbers on the board I never understood Lee obsession with Danny Stapleton. Lee never said a bad word about burgess and only picks on Stapleton??
 
The Chad said:
Unless the coaching staff decide they want out, I don't think anything changes for next season at all.

By which time, a new CEO, board & front office will be in place & have an opportunity to put things in place.

Decisions from Bula & Luai MIGHT be impacted, for future seasons. But they were already under some scrutiny anyway.
Click to expand...
Bula and Luai were here as long as Richo and Benji were

This unnecessary shake up puts both in jeapordy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 927 (members: 11, guests: 916)
Back
Top