Sure...does the government own parliament house? Or ultimately, is it the people?
No one on HBG owns anything...it's not private ownership. The issue isn't about 90% owners getting a 90% say in how things are run, it's that they are unaccountable to the people that they draw money from to control those assets.
It would all go away if members could vote.
Ok sir, if you want to be technical I stand corrected. HBG doesn't own 90%, it controls 90% or at least should.Sure...does the government own parliament house? Or ultimately, is it the people?
No one on HBG owns anything...it's not private ownership. The issue isn't about 90% owners getting a 90% say in how things are run, it's that they are unaccountable to the people that they draw money from to control those assets.
It would all go away if members could vote.
Wests Magpies own 90% of Wests Tigers so this should give them a controlling vote on the board when necessary and without being unfair.
I believe Wests Magpies value and care about their members and lots of people in the community through their generous donations.
I don't see any reason whatsoever for WESTS MAGPIES to yield control to anyone, at least until such time that we have a board that RESPECTS each other and things are running smoothly.
So, Imo you will never get WESTS MAGPIES to yield by using the tactics y'all have adopted.