If Bulla is killing it and we are winning games and scoring points ,defending the line etc, it isn't paying overs it's setting up a successful team.
I personally don't believe anything that is said in the media as it is all about inflaming a situation so we click on the headlines. Shaun seems to be playing cards from the Richo deck - no discussions and any leaks the deal is off the table.
We all enter into and walk away from contracts every day. It is not that difficult - if something is priced higher than we are willing to pay we walk away. Pepsi Max at a servo is a classic example - at $5.70 a bottle I walk away every time, but at $4 in the local shop I will buy it. Contracting for anything is not much different just on a bigger scale.
The smarts of contracting is in incentivising the contract to the benefit of both parties. For example in the Constuction game I would do a profit split with trades on bigger jobs if the job came in early. If the job came in early I had already allowed a % for wages etc. So now I am not paying that so a win for me. It is a win for the trade as he isn't paying wages for the job as it has finished early and he can get paid. But the bigger bonus for me is the bonus applied to the contract if I bring it in early - so bonus on bonus - and a happy client because they move in on time.
Now we simply need to shift the incentivised contracting to the NRL. If we link ratchet clauses to peformance metrics and/or results the players are incentivised to perform to receive the bonus. Them wanting the bonus also affects their team mates as they are pushing them too. It can't be overdone or it becomes detrimental.
What we don't hear in any of the scuttlbut and BS put out by the media is how the contracts are structured until they start to fall apart. Stefano for example; however, in our case I think we got the better end of the stick letting him walk that has allowed us to recruit to what we have at present (not a proven success but heading in the right direction).
Our CEO and recruitment team have been around the buoy a few times. I'm sure they know a thing or two about contracting to the benefit of all parties. They know exactly what tactics Moses and the like use and will have a game plan for it.
Personally I view the Bula situation as a good thing. We are clearly negotiating and if expereinced heads are in the room all parties will walk away with something of benefit. If there are get out clauses negotiated in for Bula what have we negotiated into the contract to our benefit - we surely aren't going to simply give up and handover the keys to the Salary Cap - SM is too smart and experienced for that!