In theory, it wouldn’t be a new club at all !
Wests have been around since 1908, and Wests Ashfield (aka HBG) have been their benefactor since 1955.
The emblem is but a piffling matter of branding.
Wests rebranded as Wests
Nothing new about that 🤷♂️
Mate the fact you can’t see how the thing you’re debating for is on the same coin , just the opposite side , of the thing you’re fighting against is mental to me . You’re either the dumbest human alive or a bad faith actor .
Either way it’s not painting you in the brightest light .
The fact you can’t see that you will multiple generations of fans if you change it from a tiger to a magpie , whilst fighting for the “magpie” is eye opening .
from what I can tell it’s basically , I want the magpie , F everyone else . Also F the future of the club , because a change like that would mean a break in the licensing agreement and ultimately Balmain would be able to get branding and product back , which ultimately those guys will leverage into much like the bears , an amalgamation with a new club , with a traditional identity , plus juniors .
Thats 💯 would be the outcome of all this stupid talk. And it would implode the Wests Magpies JRLFC . And it absolutely would ! The reality is they had Sweet F A fans at the end , by comparison to other major Sydney clubs , and that simply by the fact they haven’t existed in the top flight for 26 years would only be less and less . It’s absolutely delusional to think that a nostalgic brand , that is associated with failure ( sorry but it is for anyone who isn’t a magpies fan ) , would supplant and ultimately thrive on a current established brand .
No business in their right mind would even consider it . Which is probably why HBG are …. Sad ! The fact that you still think it’s a Balmain issue when rather it’s a branding issue is beyond me . What are you even saying ? So stupid . And counter intuitive