Search results

I don't recall that. That's average.

What? Me complimenting Ink's contribution to the forum? Have a lie down, ye ol' stirrer of pots.

I'd assume coach pay outs wouldn't. The football department cap is relatively low, so if paying out a coach was stuck to that, teams would struggle to replace any coach they rissole. It's a different process to playing contracts in that regards as far as I'm aware.

Love ya work, Ink.

Lol.

Send 'em to the Gulag.

Haha, yes. Who pays those bills though?

Correct mate, Shaun was his heir-apparent. Hopefully he steps into the chair. Everything we've heard of Shaun is quality. The only other acceptable candidate would be Brian Fletcher, formerly at Panthers.

Good call. If he continues to languish, he'll get correctly dumped with a pay out anyway. That pay out will come out of HBG's coffers, so who cares. But what it does do, is provide immediate stability in a key area. It'll allow the playing group to feel some sort of security in their coach...

:LOL: You joined on Tuesday... You're still carrying on, trying to downplay the support. We're aware of what you and your other social media cronies have been trying to do. You must have been assigned the 'Wests Tigers Forum' to muddy the waters and sow discontent. Stamo, Marky Mac, Pies...

Agree mate.

Incorrect. And people like yourself are continuing to muddy the waters. The message is clear; Return the club to a structure of independent governance. If HBG cannot return the Wests Tigers Football Club to an independently governed entity, then either sell, replace the current board or...

So did I.

There is zero conflicting messaging. If HBG are pressured to sell, the NRL will assume interim ownership until a buyer is found. The club, itself, is going nowhere.

Lol, 'wow'. Un-bunch those panties. Spartan is entitled to his opinion as much as the next person. None of that changes the fact that the rally is solely about the future stability and health of the Wests Tigers in perpetuity. The messaging around the rally is everywhere and it is crystal...

Rubbish. Michael despises the Tigers despite what he says outwardly. I've heard it straight from his mouth on two, separate occasions on the drink. It's all hearsay, so take it with a grain of salt, but those brief discussions are tattooed onto my brain anytime his name comes up.

Exactly. Anybody talking about this being ANYTHING but a coup to regain full control of the football club is either being deliberately obtuse or is wrong. Get them them out. Now.

I'm not a Leichhardt type. At all. I was testing your logical consistency. You failed, miserably. So you, indeed, wouldn't 'support the club in whatever form it may reveal itself'? You flat-out lied. Good to know.

Those answers are absolute garbage. Credit to Proszenko for asking some decent questions. Daniel Paton, you're on the list 🎯

So if it suddenly rebranded as Balmain Tigers, would you 'support the club in whatever form it may reveal itself'?