100% no chance at all

@LaT said:
Some people just can't admit being wrong. Show some class.

how the hell can I admit I was wrong when we LOST!!! we lost by 14 points!! there is no such thing as moral victories we lost by 14 points!!!!! for god sake we were never ever going to win the game, the storm were always going to take us. another decent might have beaten them tonight

we just got beat by 14 points by a team that played the worst it ever will all year. so how the hell can we EVER beat them??
 
@LaT said:
Some people just can't admit being wrong. Show some class.

how the hell can I admit I was wrong when we LOST!!! we lost by 14 points!! there is no such thing as moral victories we lost by 14 points!!!!! for god sake we were never ever going to win the game, the storm were always going to take us. another decent might have beaten them tonight

we just got beat by 14 points by a team that played the worst it ever will all year. so how the hell can we EVER beat them??
 
@LaT said:
Some people just can't admit being wrong. Show some class.

how the hell can I admit I was wrong when we LOST!!! we lost by 14 points!! there is no such thing as moral victories we lost by 14 points!!!!! for god sake we were never ever going to win the game, the storm were always going to take us. another decent might have beaten them tonight

we just got beat by 14 points by a team that played the worst it ever will all year. so how the hell can we EVER beat them??
 
we were great for 60 mins but I am sorry guys Rugby league is a 80 min game, and the storm won this game by playing for 20 mins and scoring 3 quick trys.

Had we played the full 80 and got beaten something like 13-12 then maybe I would be clapping for the loss like everyone else is
 
Try and understand what 100% means in a probability context. You are saying we walked on to the field with 0% chance of winning.

Were were deadset in that, nobody who was watching could say any different.

The thread was wrong. Whether you man up and admit it means nothing to be honest.
 
what is it with this forum being so slow and double posting??

anyway all this game did was put us DOWN the ladder and make out F and A even more worse. at least we got the storm and Manly games out of the way.

but I am not celebrating a 14 point loss like some of you guys are on here. I am please and happy with how we played for 60 mins. and if we can play like that in most games for 60 mins we might win half our games this year
that's how we beat the bad teams like eels panthers why?? we played for 60 mins. and let those 2 teams come back into it for the final 20.
BUT. if we wanna beat the big dogs 80 mins is what we have to play for simple as that.
 
No we didn't ur you were suggesting likelyhood . In that you mean every game is 100% certain because only 1 team wins. Then agin why am I surprised when it co es to the intelligence of certain forum members
 
@Golden said:
we were great for 60 mins but I am sorry guys Rugby league is a 80 min game, and the storm won this game by playing for 20 mins and scoring 3 quick trys.

Had we played the full 80 and got beaten something like 13-12 then maybe I would be clapping for the loss like everyone else is

your logic…ergh...i dont even know why i'm responding. buttt:

so you're saying that if tedesco had made that one tackle and we'd gotten that try which we should have. You'd be lauding their efforts? cause the score woulda been 20-18 to storm. I'm sure you'll say 'we diddn't play the full 80!!!' and to that i say....shut up and support your team who played amazingly against the premiers, world champions and top of the ladder team AT HOME with 19000 pissed off storm supporters. if you wanna continue on and berate them like a child who doesnt want to admit he was wrong then go for it, but i ain't bothering with your comments. :crazy
 
Stevie Wonder could have seen the improvement in that game tonight, we were a massive step up from our last 4 games.

Not sure why you feel the need to mask your dissapoinment in the team by posting I told you so.

Pout you lip, pick up your ball and walk home.
 
We were good out there. Yes we have to improve if we want to be the best team in the comp but that was a good effort.

Our forwards were great and we played to a high level.
 
well Mick Potter agree with me did you watch the press conference?? he said all that was important was the result

Farah said himself they cracked under pressure for the last 20\. also we did our usual let a try in before halftime
 
@Golden said:
**well Mick Potter agree with me did you watch the press conference?? he said all that was important was the result**

Farah said himself they cracked under pressure for the last 20\. also we did our usual let a try in before halftime

Do you think Potter walked into AAMI Stadium tonight thinking we had 0% chance of winning?

I think the point you had was that we had PRACTICALLY no chance of winning, what let you down was using a percentage as well as misunderstanding of high school level statistics.
 
@LaT said:
Some people just can't admit being wrong. Show some class.

Mate this is the guy who after the Roosters game last yr, the day Robbie lost his mum was the only person on this entire forum who was whinging about the result. The rest of us could see that was a write off and the players heads weren't there (see Benji) but no, this guy couldn't care about that, he still whinged. Don't expect class, he has none
 
ok ok.. well put it this way If that loss meant anything and you guys think it was a good loss, we should beat the dragons no problem then next week looks like benji will be out there at least Jamie Field Goal Soward will be trying to kick Field goals for 80 mins
 
If I was everyone I wouldn't waste my time with this fool. He surely is a Gen Y that isn't very good at articulating his frustrations. I say ignore all further posts he creates. Hopefully he will dissapear. Please???
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top