3,2,1

[kh_canada]

Very confused as to how Marsters gets points. Doesn't his clean miss on Thompson disqualify him or are these ratings just based on attack?

Every time he went for a hit-up it was with speed, enthusiasm, strength. In the last 10 minutes when most players were shot, he was the hardest runner of the ball, consistently broke through tackles and looked for offloads. One error isn't enough to detract from his performance IMO.

 

[southerntiger]

Very confused as to how Marsters gets points. Doesn't his clean miss on Thompson disqualify him or are these ratings just based on attack?

Every time he went for a hit-up it was with speed, enthusiasm, strength. In the last 10 minutes when most players were shot, he was the hardest runner of the ball, consistently broke through tackles and looked for offloads. One error isn't enough to detract from his performance IMO.

I thought he played well but that one error - a very big one - means I can't find room for him in my 3, 2, 1.

For the record:

3\. Brooks
2\. Matulino
1\. Marshall

 

[larrycorowa]

3 - Brooks
2 - Matulino
1 - Marshall

Yep. How good. Hardly a bad player. Happy for Kev and mwz. Grub like a fish out of water at 9.

 

[Geo]

Very confused as to how Marsters gets points. Doesn't his clean miss on Thompson disqualify him or are these ratings just based on attack?

Every time he went for a hit-up it was with speed, enthusiasm, strength. In the last 10 minutes when most players were shot, he was the hardest runner of the ball, consistently broke through tackles and looked for offloads. One error isn't enough to detract from his performance IMO.

I thought he played well but that one error - a very big one - means I can't find room for him in my 3, 2, 1.

For the record:

3\. Brooks
2\. Matulino
1\. Marshall

I believe that was Nofoaluma's fault as his wingman and being selected in the team… :astonished:

With so many doing well I agree a lot just out of points...

 

[colmcd]

1\. Brooks,
2\. Naquama, Kevie you are killing it.
3\. Everyone else! Mats, Lawrence, Marshall, Thompson, everyone.

 

[Spartan117]

Looks like Brooks 3 is unanimous

Honorable Mentions
Matulino
Marshal
Lawrence
Thompson
Twal

Certainly a cracker of a game

 

[Tigerdon]

1\. Brooks
2\. Matts
3\. Lawrence

I guess we outplayed Manly in every position. It's getting hard to call our centres to weakest position in our team (which I have) when they keep outplaying their opposition.
I know it's only Round 6 but we have to be very happy with how the team as a whole is performing. The foundations are very good and no one deserves to be dropped. The players on the sidelines waiting to come back from injury and the ones going well in ISP unable to get a start, is a testament to what Ivan has done in a short period of time.

 

[Pawsandclaws]

Very confused as to how Marsters gets points. Doesn't his clean miss on Thompson disqualify him or are these ratings just based on attack?

The withering look he received from Nofoaluma should ensure it won't happen again. Young players make mistakes and importantly need to learn from them. No short cuts.

 

[Demps]

3\. Masters
2\. BROOKS
1\. Benji

 

[Mr_Magpie]

Brooks as MOM is the only given IMHO.
Cannot disagree with any other opinions here as they all played so darn well.
Gee, this team is going so well it's great to be trying to decide the 3 best! Many moons since we had that problem. 😂

 

[Tacky]

3\. Brooks
2\. Matulino
1\. Marshall

 

[Tiger_Steve]

Very confused as to how Marsters gets points. Doesn't his clean miss on Thompson disqualify him or are these ratings just based on attack?

Every time he went for a hit-up it was with speed, enthusiasm, strength. In the last 10 minutes when most players were shot, he was the hardest runner of the ball, consistently broke through tackles and looked for offloads. One error isn't enough to detract from his performance IMO.

I thought he played well but that one error - a very big one - means I can't find room for him in my 3, 2, 1.

For the record:

3\. Brooks
2\. Matulino
1\. Marshall

I believe that was Nofoaluma's fault as his wingman and being selected in the team… :astonished:

With so many doing well I agree a lot just out of points...

Geez I’d hate to be on your bad side!! Nofa comments were two weeks ago and you’re still having a dig :wink:

 

[maxxy86]

3 The halves
2 The forwards
1 The Backs

Well put….... probably have to add the bench for respectfully providing 1 2 and 3 aswell

 

[southerntiger]

Very confused as to how Marsters gets points. Doesn't his clean miss on Thompson disqualify him or are these ratings just based on attack?

The withering look he received from Nofoaluma should ensure it won't happen again. Young players make mistakes and importantly need to learn from them. No short cuts.

Absolutely agree but when a team wins 38-12 with many great performers, I can't find room for a player who makes such basic and significant error in my top 3.

 

[yeti]

Off topic, but was Lawrence injured when replaced or just knackered?

 

[earl]

3\. Brooks
2\. Matulino
1\. Benji

 

[Tigerdave]

Can we give Brooks 6?

3\. Brooks
2\. Benji
1\. Matulino and just about everyone else to be honest