3,2,1...

@ said:
@ said:
3\. Matulino
2\. MCK
1\. Marsters

Go wth this …the FAN BOYS are out with the normal rose coloured glasses on !

No more than those eager to stick in the boot…their absence for the two weeks prior must have taken a toll..
 
@ said:
@ said:
Matulino
Really !!!

You guys must really be desperate
What did he do, got one offload away and belted a teenage half.

His runs are softer than Woods on a bad day, falls to the ground as soon as a finger is laid on him.
We must have been worse than I thought if he's getting 3 points.

I give him 3 points for soft

That is how bad the rest of those pretenders were …and at least he belted someone.

He puts a good hit on in most matches, but apart from that he really doesn’t offer much. Nowhere near the player he once was but I guess we can say that about a lot of our past and more recent signings.
 
@ said:
Matulino got over the advantage line nearly everytime.

3 - Matulino
2 - Sue
1 - MCK? - I don't know, noone else really had any impact.

That's because Matulino only ever runs the ball after all the hard work has been done and we're already getting over the advantage line.
He's never the one to get us going, he just plays off the back of the go forward, kind of like how Willie Mason used to play, wait for the damage to be done by Omealy then take a hitup and look like a gun.

Matulino does not lay a platform for this team neither does Packer.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
3 Sue
2 Marsters
1 Nofoaluma

Honourable mentions Chee-Kam Brooks Mataulino Thompson Garner ..

Naughty Corner..Everyone else..

I thought nofo was terrible

Ran for 171m…40m more than anyone else in the team..and more than 5 of our forwards combined..

Chee Kam had better stats but don’t let that get in the way of blind love .

:laughing:

MCK makes a clear miss leading to the last try , gave away 2 penalties from memory (possibly more ) one of which the Dogs score from

Can't question his running game though
 

Latest posts

Back
Top