3 ex Tigers Fifita, Woods and Taupau on the outer

[InBenjiWeTrust]

Taupau and Woods at a reasonable price

 

[WT2K]

No thanks. All cooked.

 

[Tiger5150]

I'd take Tapau, cheap to replace Packer

 

[hsvjones]

I would take Woods on the cheap as he can play big mins and i think his defence is pretty solid.

Taupau but only if cheap but sounds like he will go to the biggest payday and that's not us...

 

[Guest]

They're all past their use-by date. No thanks.

 

[TYGA]

We need a halfback, second rower before we do anything. We have to learn to stop buying players off the market that are expensive.

They will offload Taupau because we were dumb enough to let go Paseka for a bag of Doritos.

 

[Yossarian]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

 

[choiboi]

I pick youth

 

[Telltails]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree - not sure what Tamou offers atm - but will reserve judgement for a few weeks - but at this moment would swap him for Woods in heartbeat.

 

[Mighty_Tiger]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree. Woods is actually playing quality footy at the Sharks. He would be a walk up starter in our side if be came back & would improve the side. Issue is the way he left. If you run a business and in the market to improve the squad & he is an option they would have to look at him.

 

[Elderslie_Tiger]

If we took one of the three who would we let go to accommodate him Packer is exempt from your choice.

 

[hsvjones]

If we took one of the three who would we let go to accommodate him Packer is exempt from your choice.

I would take Woods for our bench spot.. Can play big mins if required, Very solid in defence and would be cheaper than Marty T.. He is going to the highest bidder and that would be Dogs.

 

[Russell]

If I had a choice of the three - absolutely none.

Tapou and Woods didn't want to stay with us.

Fifita - don't think he is half as good as a lot on here.
Turned into a crock now and he's not sure what nationality he is -
Thinks he could be Australian, Lebanese, Aboriginal, Tongan -
Very mixed up Dude + The fact he is a bludger & a ratbag.

Seems like we might have a Fifita Fanboy downgrading. LOL

 

[Russell]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree - not sure what Tamou offers atm - but will reserve judgement for a few weeks - but at this moment would swap him for Woods in heartbeat.

I can tell you as a captain he won't be trying to flog a few of our better players off to other clubs.

He showed his true colours - unfortunately they weren't ours.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree. Woods is actually playing quality footy at the Sharks. He would be a walk up starter in our side if be came back & would improve the side. Issue is the way he left. If you run a business and in the market to improve the squad & he is an option they would have to look at him.

I could be good at what I do and if I publicly slag off my ex-employer while I was in their employ they would look stupid for having me back.

 

[Merlot]

If we took one of the three who would we let go to accommodate him Packer is exempt from your choice.

I would take Woods for our bench spot.. Can play big mins if required, Very solid in defence and would be cheaper than Marty T.. He is going to the highest bidder and that would be Dogs.

once bitten twice shy

 

[Mighty_Tiger]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree. Woods is actually playing quality footy at the Sharks. He would be a walk up starter in our side if be came back & would improve the side. Issue is the way he left. If you run a business and in the market to improve the squad & he is an option they would have to look at him.

I could be good at what I do and if I publicly slag off my ex-employer while I was in their employ they would look stupid for having me back.

Depends what your options are.

 

[Telltails]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree - not sure what Tamou offers atm - but will reserve judgement for a few weeks - but at this moment would swap him for Woods in heartbeat.

I can tell you as a captain he won't be trying to flog a few of our better players off to other clubs.

He showed his true colours - unfortunately they weren't ours.

Woods influencing Teddy - yeh right. Teddy had no intention of signing with us or the Bulldogs or he would of - despite what we, or Woods may have wanted. Teddy is where Teddy chose to be let's be real.

 

[gallagher]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree. Woods is actually playing quality footy at the Sharks. He would be a walk up starter in our side if be came back & would improve the side. Issue is the way he left. If you run a business and in the market to improve the squad & he is an option they would have to look at him.

I could be good at what I do and if I publicly slag off my ex-employer while I was in their employ they would look stupid for having me back.

But we still bought Farah back.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

I’m not saying we should target him but Woods is still a quality prop doing what he did for us all those years ago. I think he made 46 tackles and ran 148m in a badly beaten side on Saturday night. If one of our props did that the cascade of orgasms would be heard from Mars.

Agree. Woods is actually playing quality footy at the Sharks. He would be a walk up starter in our side if be came back & would improve the side. Issue is the way he left. If you run a business and in the market to improve the squad & he is an option they would have to look at him.

I could be good at what I do and if I publicly slag off my ex-employer while I was in their employ they would look stupid for having me back.

But we still bought Farah back.

Yes, and I did not agree with that.