Adam Quinlan

@Milky said:
@innsaneink said:
You asked for thoughts.
People think different to you

We have enough youth as it is….

I asked for their opinion of Quinlan not about me.

Great point.

The ongoing crap towards Milky over the past year is childish. So Milky is a little left field, so what? Is that a reason to take a dislike to the guy and give him a hard time? Im not singling any one poster out, nor am i throwing everyone in under the one banner. But for the minority who jump on this enthusiastic supporters back continuously, grow up. Take his posts for what they are, harmless.
 
Chin up Milky it brought a smile to my face to see you are off in fantasy land again. As I posted on one of your earlier threads, someone has got to get the keyboard conversations started, so keep it up.
 
@king sirro said:
@Milky said:
@innsaneink said:
You asked for thoughts.
People think different to you

We have enough youth as it is….

I asked for their opinion of Quinlan not about me.

Great point.

The ongoing crap towards Milky over the past year is childish. So Milky is a little left field, so what? Is that a reason to take a dislike to the guy and give him a hard time? Im not singling any one poster out, nor am i throwing everyone in under the one banner. But for the minority who jump on this enthusiastic supporters back continuously, grow up. Take his posts for what they are, harmless.

KS with all due respect if you start a thread ,whatever comes your way comes your way

Piece of advice Milky ,when you start a thread like this don't make it out like we should sign him

Ask your opinion about him as a player and that's that and even say you not looking at signing him

Half the time you've got him signed sealed and delivered and the side changes faster than you could change you jocks from week to week

And if your not BM96 , you need to meet him , you were separated at birth
 
@king sirro said:
@Milky said:
@innsaneink said:
You asked for thoughts.
People think different to you

We have enough youth as it is….

I asked for their opinion of Quinlan not about me.

Great point.

The ongoing crap towards Milky over the past year is childish. So Milky is a little left field, so what? Is that a reason to take a dislike to the guy and give him a hard time? Im not singling any one poster out, nor am i throwing everyone in under the one banner. But for the minority who jump on this enthusiastic supporters back continuously, grow up. Take his posts for what they are, harmless.

As usual are spot on. I once posted in support of BM96 over setting similar. If people aren't interested in it, don't reply to him/her nstead of having a dig. Sure not all the threads are great but he/she obviously is enthusiastic about the club and has passion for the team.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Sorry about all the spelling mistakes. Autocorrect strikes again and not sure if can edit posts on roarfeed

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Great point.

The ongoing crap towards Milky over the past year is childish. So Milky is a little left field, so what? Is that a reason to take a dislike to the guy and give him a hard time? Im not singling any one poster out, nor am i throwing everyone in under the one banner. But for the minority who jump on this enthusiastic supporters back continuously, grow up. Take his posts for what they are, harmless.

x2

Bradley

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Well I don't think we're in a position to sign Quinlan, and I think Austin will have first crack at 6 next year alongside Brooks.

Sirro will start next season in the backrow.
 
Why would we try and make our forward pack smaller than it already is by playing Austin who isn't even in Fulton's ,BMM or Blair's postcode as a second rower ??

Why would we want Quinlan when we already Moses , who has built combinations with Brooks already ??

Why would we pinch a player from the Saints (who wouldn't release a fart in our direction ,let alone a player) who isn't at Moses's skill level and a fullback come 5/8 ??

When you start a thread , a touch of logic would be handy
 
@happy tiger said:
Why would we try and make our forward pack smaller than it already is by playing Austin who isn't even in Fulton's ,BMM or Blair's postcode as a second rower ??

Why would we want Quinlan when we already Moses , who has built combinations with Brooks already ??

Why would we pinch a player from the Saints (who wouldn't release a fart in our direction ,let alone a player) who isn't at Moses's skill level and a fullback come 5/8 ??

When you start a thread , a touch of logic would be handy

Because we are the Wests Tigers…

You cant critisise the kid for starting a thread about signing a player we dont need, considering how confused he must be with all the other silly signings we have made over the years.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@happy tiger said:
Why would we try and make our forward pack smaller than it already is by playing Austin who isn't even in Fulton's ,BMM or Blair's postcode as a second rower ??

Why would we want Quinlan when we already Moses , who has built combinations with Brooks already ??

Why would we pinch a player from the Saints (who wouldn't release a fart in our direction ,let alone a player) who isn't at Moses's skill level and a fullback come 5/8 ??

When you start a thread , a touch of logic would be handy

Because we are the Wests Tigers…

You cant critisise the kid for starting a thread about signing a player we dont need, considering how confused he must be with all the other silly signings we have made over the years.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

Because the Sheenius has gone Watto He is well and truly ancient history

We have the logical Mr Potter who is pushing us in the right direction

And I can and I have criticised the kid Watto .

I have spoken to him before and given advice how to stop and think about what he is typing and not to include them as squad members and just ask the question about the player

I was joking with the BM96 comment

But I'm not apologizing , if Milky starts thread and it isn't thought out and some logic applied he will hear about it He needs to be able to defend his position with some sort of argument No different than anyone else here

Same way when I (and probably yourself) played up two or three grades when young . You copped it and copped it sweet on the field and you couldn't do much about it

Life is about lessons , good and bad
 
@willow said:
Well I don't think we're in a position to sign Quinlan, and I think Austin will have first crack at 6 next year alongside Brooks.

Sirro will start next season in the backrow.

I've always assumed Austin was a depth signing, and feel Potter will play Braith at 6 to allow Luke find his feet.

This may change in the second half of the year, but experience will be very important for Luke in the first 16weeks.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@happy tiger said:
@Tiger Watto said:
@happy tiger said:
Why would we try and make our forward pack smaller than it already is by playing Austin who isn't even in Fulton's ,BMM or Blair's postcode as a second rower ??

Why would we want Quinlan when we already Moses , who has built combinations with Brooks already ??

Why would we pinch a player from the Saints (who wouldn't release a fart in our direction ,let alone a player) who isn't at Moses's skill level and a fullback come 5/8 ??

When you start a thread , a touch of logic would be handy

Because we are the Wests Tigers…

You cant critisise the kid for starting a thread about signing a player we dont need, considering how confused he must be with all the other silly signings we have made over the years.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

Because the Sheenius has gone Watto He is well and truly ancient history

We have the logical Mr Potter who is pushing us in the right direction

And I can and I have criticised the kid Watto .

I have spoken to him before and given advice how to stop and think about what he is typing and not to include them as squad members and just ask the question about the player

I was joking with the BM96 comment

But I'm not apologizing , if Milky starts thread and it isn't thought out and some logic applied he will hear about it He needs to be able to defend his position with some sort of argument No different than anyone else here

Same way when I (and probably yourself) played up two or three grades when young . You copped it and copped it sweet on the field and you couldn't do much about it

Life is about lessons , good and bad

Happy, I have a lot of respect for you and I don't expect you to apologise..I was just asking for everyones opinion on Quinlan and suddenly this thread becomes about me…
 
Don't listen to them Milky. Post what you want within the rules. It's a forum.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Well on the subject of Quinlan - he looks okay but I'm not sure what he ads. He's not an established NRL player and we have prospects in the position.

Next!!
 
Actually Milky ,its not about you at this stage

Its about Forum members now expecting me or anyone else to treat you or any other member differently than anyone else on the Forum if we disagree ( I don't think that sounds much like a Forum anymore )

Again the BM96 was a joke

This is a completely different situation that you have unfortunately got caught in the middle of

As Watto has stated (and him representing the Mods) that I shouldn't be picking on you or other members

Rules are obviously rules now , anyone else I shouldn't criticise or disagree with now ??

PM the list if you like :unamused: :wtf
 
I'd sign him just so the Dragons have one less half. Leave them nothing lol.

Nah but seriously he's an okay young player but we have him well and truly covered. Moses, Brooks, Austin, Anasta, Moltzen, Sironen are all better halves. He's only in the NRL because the Dragons are hopeless and have no halves depth. Actually he's probably about on par with Moltzen from what I've seen. A decent runner of the ball and that's about it. He's a lot like Moltzen actually, minus the experience.

There are clubs out there with awesome halves depth to poach from. If I was looking for young halves to steal the Dragons would be low on my list of clubs to look at. We have the best young halves. By a long way.
 
Re-signed with the Drags for 2 yrs

http://www.dragons.com.au/news-display/Quinlan-ReSigns-With-Dragons/80626

What purpose do fantasy threads like these serve?
 

Members online

Back
Top