Aug 19, 2016 #1 R ricksen New member Apparently the tv coverage mentioned that we're still paying him. Surely that can't be right?
Aug 22, 2016 #4 R ricksen New member @willow said: We're not paying him. Click to expand... If true - and I believe it is - how/why are fox or 9 (whichever it was) bringing this up?
@willow said: We're not paying him. Click to expand... If true - and I believe it is - how/why are fox or 9 (whichever it was) bringing this up?
Aug 22, 2016 #5 K Kavi New member @ricksen said: @willow said: We're not paying him. If true - and I believe it is - how/why are fox or 9 (whichever it was) bringing this up? Click to expand... Click to expand... they spread trash for a living… they pay anasta
@ricksen said: @willow said: We're not paying him. If true - and I believe it is - how/why are fox or 9 (whichever it was) bringing this up? Click to expand... Click to expand... they spread trash for a living… they pay anasta
Aug 22, 2016 #6 R ricksen New member @Kavi said: @ricksen said: @willow said: We're not paying him. If true - and I believe it is - how/why are fox or 9 (whichever it was) bringing this up? they spread trash for a living… they pay anasta Click to expand... Click to expand... Click to expand... Fair Just seems a really odd thing to make up about a pretty peripheral player that most wouldn't have heard of.
@Kavi said: @ricksen said: @willow said: We're not paying him. If true - and I believe it is - how/why are fox or 9 (whichever it was) bringing this up? they spread trash for a living… they pay anasta Click to expand... Click to expand... Click to expand... Fair Just seems a really odd thing to make up about a pretty peripheral player that most wouldn't have heard of.
DempsModerator