The_Patriot
Well-known member
@strongee said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509519) said:@the_patriot said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509516) said:@strongee said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509514) said:@the_patriot said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509434) said:@strongee said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509419) said:@the_patriot said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509412) said:Speaking of US politics @Kul can you kill all the non football rubbish in this forum. It does nothing but add to the overall divide.
We are not here to be woke we are here to talk Wests Tigers
Not to argue ,what are you talking about ? I’m curious which threads you want scrapped ? Or is it all threads non tigers related ?
My "opinion" is that other than music threads and other types of sports nothing at all can be gained by allowing people to argue over political and other divisive topics. It does nothing but add to the division in the fanbase and serves zero purpose in a fan forum
I
It’s a forum ?!!!? As in gathering place .
I find it amusing that you had a big rant about how only certain opinions were tolerated by the mods , and it created an environment where people didn’t feel comfortable contributing ,yet you are all for getting rid of any content that you don’t agree with .
The hypocrisy is mind blowing to me .
It certainly does look like , it’s not the fact all opinions can’t be equal , but rather your opinions you want to be the ones that are taken the most seriously .
In my opinion it’s not a balance that is being advocated for here , but a complete tilting of the scales in the other direction . It’s funny you bring up politics as if it’s causing divisions , yet you can’t see the forest from the trees and your own biases and desire for an echo chamber . Maybe it’s being lost in translation , but through years of arguing with you , I don’t think so .
Maybe it's text format confusing me but you seem really angry.
My issue was not the mods only allowing certain opinions. I never said that and that was definitely not what was happening.
I wont explain it all again as it was pretty clear what i was saying about mods and it also pretty clear what i was saying about the political pages causing further division.
Im all for you expressing your disappointment at Cochise being removed. Thats my point, you can have your say, its a valid opinion just dont be looking at guys like me thinking i had something to do with it lol.
@the_patriot said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509516) said:@strongee said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509514) said:@the_patriot said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509434) said:@strongee said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509419) said:@the_patriot said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509412) said:Speaking of US politics @Kul can you kill all the non football rubbish in this forum. It does nothing but add to the overall divide.
We are not here to be woke we are here to talk Wests Tigers
Not to argue ,what are you talking about ? I’m curious which threads you want scrapped ? Or is it all threads non tigers related ?
My "opinion" is that other than music threads and other types of sports nothing at all can be gained by allowing people to argue over political and other divisive topics. It does nothing but add to the division in the fanbase and serves zero purpose in a fan forum
I
It’s a forum ?!!!? As in gathering place .
I find it amusing that you had a big rant about how only certain opinions were tolerated by the mods , and it created an environment where people didn’t feel comfortable contributing ,yet you are all for getting rid of any content that you don’t agree with .
The hypocrisy is mind blowing to me .
It certainly does look like , it’s not the fact all opinions can’t be equal , but rather your opinions you want to be the ones that are taken the most seriously .
In my opinion it’s not a balance that is being advocated for here , but a complete tilting of the scales in the other direction . It’s funny you bring up politics as if it’s causing divisions , yet you can’t see the forest from the trees and your own biases and desire for an echo chamber . Maybe it’s being lost in translation , but through years of arguing with you , I don’t think so .
Maybe it's text format confusing me but you seem really angry.
My issue was not the mods only allowing certain opinions. I never said that and that was definitely not what was happening.
I wont explain it all again as it was pretty clear what i was saying about mods and it also pretty clear what i was saying about the political pages causing further division.
Im all for you expressing your disappointment at Cochise being removed. Thats my point, you can have your say, its a valid opinion just dont be looking at guys like me thinking i had something to do with it lol.
I’m not angry about anything . It’s interesting to me that if someone expresses themselves clearly and concisely on here , the first emotion that is associated with that is anger . I’ve stated it’s the way it’s ha does that I think is disrespectful, as for the action , I am not the person who had an issue with the moderation here , so I don’t really have an understanding of it. And nothing anyone has posted in this thread or previously has made me think that it’s not just a bubble version of the divisions in the broader community ie. no one really wants to bread bread , they want to be on top. Whether that’s right, left , wokism, anti vax. , Luke brooks (lol) , whatever it is .
And I call BS on people who claim to want equality when in actuality they just want to turn the snow globe on its head .
They want thier ideas whatever they are to reign supreme. .
That’s what’s I’m posting about . And I never blamed you . I think 2 people stirred this up . And the rest fell into line . But that’s neither here nor there . The mods should have been told
Privately and respectfully . And not had people dancing in thier grave. Whether your doing it or not . Is between you and the ether. I couldn’t care less .
Just don’t pretend your for impartiality, equality . Because it’s clearly not true .
That is all said pragmatically , and objectively . No anger at all.
As i said before im not going to explain my stance again. If that leads to you putting me in the one size fits all opinion of this situation thats all well and good. I dont need to argue with you because i disagree with you. Ill leave it at that.