Are we cursed?

For a start, I control my content, not you. But I will answer you this way. If you go back in this thread to earlier this morning I called out one poster for this (#156). My point is some members make it clear they find the thread distasteful yet, when it goes quiet, they give it a little push along. That's hypocritical. If that behaviour fits you, then you're a hypocrite. You decide.
I gave it s little push eh?

I think you better look again who revived the thread and gave it a nudge

Point stands...we just had our best win in years and a few here havent even commented on that...shows me why theyre here...one reason only- to cause division
 
I gave it s little push eh?

I think you better look again who revived the thread and gave it a nudge

Point stands...we just had our best win in years and a few here havent even commented on that...shows me why theyre here...one reason only- to cause division
That’s rubbish (I didn’t realise I was supposed to write a match report).

BTW - This 👇 was the horribly ‘divisive’ exchange
which set Ink off 🥴
 

Attachments

  • 3FE40F03-2E0F-4771-846F-39F1E3923155.jpeg
    3FE40F03-2E0F-4771-846F-39F1E3923155.jpeg
    310.9 KB · Views: 14
Good for you. Your opinion of me is of zero importance. You can’t post on here without personal attacks.
😂 Me?

Sweetheart, I am one of the few that rarely does. Once again, you're being lazy, not even bothering to actually do the work to figure out which poster you're actually talking to.

You engaged in cowardly behaviour and are now squirming after being called out on it.

Assessing behaviour is not a personal attack, nice try.

Stop projecting.

My definition of a coward is someone who makes personal attacks from the safety of the keyboard. So, if the cap fits, wear it.

'
My definition'? Haha, what is this, write your own dictionary day?
 
I gave it s little push eh?

I think you better look again who revived the thread and gave it a nudge

Point stands...we just had our best win in years and a few here havent even commented on that...shows me why theyre here...one reason only- to cause division
B2T was engaging with others, not you. I don’t think you needed to throw your two cents in. I agree with the general sentiment that this whole legacy W v B issue has been overdone to the point of tedium.
I will not be commenting on the legacy issues again but it’s not a one way street. There’s more than enough rubbish on both sides of the discussion. And I have done what I never thought I would in blocking 5 or 6 posters so that I don’t have to put up with their moronic rubbish.
I’m on the forum for stimulation not flagellation.
Having said that I respect you as a poster and probably agree with your views 80% of the time. No reason for me to fall out with you.
 
Once again, you’ve overreacted deluxe.
Haha, sure thing.
My posts can very rarely be accused of “yelling at the clouds about the Magpies”. I seem to spend most of my time arguing for the right of posters to mention whatever the hell they want to without being bludgeoned by the Orwellian groupthink.
Hmm.... do you though?

'Orwellian group think' 😂😂😂

Oh you poor bugger.
The majority, as you say, may well want to live in Kelce’s World
My world? What? 😂
but that doesn’t mean the minority can’t answer posts when they are fed to them. I haven’t ever started a thread (not from memory anyhow), so everything I’ve posted has been in response.
Ditto.
Hardly the MO of someone shoving his opinions onto anyone.
Strawman - I never made a point close to that. Really poor projection.
People can have different opinions on things yet still be housed under the same big top.
Of course they can, that's my point. But if your opinion is outdated and not for the betterment of the club, be prepared to be told that. Which you have been.
Not sure why you are so threatened by that 🤔
But what does 'threatened' mean in this context? Strange word to choose.
 
That’s rubbish (I didn’t realise I was supposed to write a match report).

BTW - This 👇 was the horribly ‘divisive’ exchange
which set Ink off 🥴
Really?
B2T was engaging with others, not you. I don’t think you needed to throw your two cents in. I agree with the general sentiment that this whole legacy W v B issue has been overdone to the point of tedium.
I will not be commenting on the legacy issues again but it’s not a one way street. There’s more than enough rubbish on both sides of the discussion. And I have done what I never thought I would in blocking 5 or 6 posters so that I don’t have to put up with their moronic rubbish.
I’m on the forum for stimulation not flagellation.
Having said that I respect you as a poster and probably agree with your views 80% of the time. No reason for me to fall out with you.
Maybe there was no reason for my post...its just a point i noticed.
Im not interested in this rubbish and have generally stayed out of it...doesnt interest me its unproductive and negative...
@coivtny
@Bus 2 Terrigal
Apologies ☮️
 
Haha, sure thing.

Hmm.... do you though?

'Orwellian group think' 😂😂😂

Oh you poor bugger.

My world? What? 😂

Ditto.

Strawman - I never made a point close to that. Really poor projection.

Of course they can, that's my point. But if your opinion is outdated and not for the betterment of the club, be prepared to be told that. Which you have been.

But what does 'threatened' mean in this context? Strange word to choose.
How do you chop up a post like that and present it all neat n tidy. That’s a cool look - your responses were vacuous - but the post looks aesthetically divine 🤗
 
How do you chop up a post like that and present it all neat n tidy. That’s a cool look - your responses were vacuous - but the post looks aesthetically divine 🤗
😂

It does make it easier to read the responses I find.

Gladly; you simply click on the original post that appears at the top of your reply box, then hit 'enter' to start a new line and it will chop the original post up for you to allow you to respond to specific parts.
 
positive spin , the media is showing WTs some respect .That media curse needs to be broken before the 50/50s go our way. I'm of to the Benji thread ,poor bunji would have been dead in the water and his name tarnished if justin and his puppy where still here .And his peer's in the media didnt have his back
 
Can't you just ban him for obvious trolling?

I was away for a lengthy spell and come back, and it's the exact same nonsense he was posting before I left.
Wow!!! you must be a very influential poster P_b.
It wasn't long after you suggested I should be banned "for obvious trolling" and "the exact same nonsense"..........that I 'was' banned for 10 days.

Maybe a case of if yuh don't ask yuh don't get.
I'll have to try this tactic sometime, hoping I get the same result.
 
Wow!!! you must be a very influential poster P_b.
It wasn't long after you suggested I should be banned "for obvious trolling" and "the exact same nonsense"..........that I 'was' banned for 10 days.

Maybe a case of if yuh don't ask yuh don't get.
I'll have to try this tactic sometime, hoping I get the same result.
What did you do this time?
 
Back
Top