@Geo said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1140573) said:@Tiger_Steve said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1140559) said:@GNR4LIFE said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1140557) said:@Tigerlily said in [ARL\-The 90's\.\.](/post/1140555) said:Bugger Gnr you snuck in and pinched Laurie?...
Greg Alexander... @JD-Tiger
And you just stole Brandy from me. 4 of my picks gone, and we’re not even through the first round. This is gonna be fun.
90’s an awesome era. So so many Amazing players to pick from. Gonna be real hard to rank them later
Pretty much..think there is more guns in the era than at present..so picking is a bit easier..
The voting is going to be more difficult ..given that and as I've said voting is subjective and up to the individual how they vote but ask people to consider the whole or bulk of the decade rather than a year or 2 at either end where they were guns in the 80's or 00'..
The happy clause shouldn't apply...using Wendell Sailor from the last comp as it's the stand out played 0 games in the decade and is a great winger no doubt and rated highly based on that but his contribution to the actual decade was umm 0...
Again tho it's not a set rule just my thoughts for consideration..
Make it a rule mate, makes more competitive!