It hurts me when I see the Brooks haters out in force. It's as if they haven't watched him play since 2016. I have watched every single game of ours in the last five years. The difference between Brooks then and Brooks from 2018 onward is remarkable.
- He takes the line on more than any half in the competition.
- His defence is as good as any half. His missed tackle count is still high, but I haven't seen a miss from him affect the defensive line in three years. He almost always makes the important one-on-one tackles (see how he hammered Sam Burgess last year).
- His long kicking game has been on-point (average kicking metres has increased each year).
- Short kicking game is great. I know this is most people's gripe about him. Check his 2018 stats (the year he won Dally M Halfback of the year). He had 22 forced drop outs, I believe that was the second most that year.
- More try assists each year (16 in 2019, 10 in 2018, 9 in 2017).
It annoys me when people say "get rid of Brooks". And then what? Spend another 5-10 years trying to find a halfback? I know he never has the best opinions, but Steve 'Blocker' Roach (I think it was him. Either him or Matthew Johns) put it best when he said that he believes halves, on average, take 100 first grade games to mature and reach their potential. 100 games. That is how much time you have to invest in a halfback.
It is time to accept that he is a very good player and is more than worthy of both his price tag and place in our team!