OFFICIAL Blake Ayshford [Discussion]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
@Cultured Bogan said:
Always been a fan of Blake, but there's no defending his efforts of late.

May as well give a young bloke a go.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
Click to expand...

Second tier salary cap says no.

We can most definitely bring Koro in and TimSim to centre. Really hope that happens.

I'd drop Lawrence before Ayshford though - that's only if Lawrence is leaving too.
 
I wish I could defend Blake but I can't. He was terrible today. To make it worse, his body language backed it up. Looked far from interested. If he's in the team next week i'll be filthy after that. Move Simona to the centres and bring in Koroibete. Blake doesn't deserve first grade next week.
 
I was on sharks forums and they said his a crap signing and is so slow lol thanks agian for signing him off us. we made a better signing in Keith Lulia anways.
 
I think Blake is more worried about ensuring his hair stays in place than actually playing footy. He has always been a very average player except when the defence is blown apart. Against a structured defence he has always been very poor.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
@LaT said:
He was a good footballer and rightly deserved praise from people on this forum.

Would love to know what attrubutes he possesses that made him a good footballer. Please elaborate.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

He WAS a strong runner, he HAD a decent offload, he HAD energy and drive, he WENT backwards, he WAS once a solid developing NRL player with potential.

Notice the past tense is being used. You can't erase 2010/11 by closing your eyes and pretending they never happened.

He was not always this bad, it doesn't become true just because you repeat it.
 
First you said he was a good player, now you are saying he was a solid developing NRL player? Which one is it? There is a big difference.

He is an average player at best who played one good season of football.

He is slow for an outside back, he is a hog who rarely passes the ball and he's always been an average defender. And to say he had energy is just ridiculous, he's always looked lethargic on the field, even when in form.
 
I agree with LaT here. He was a good developing player but after last years injuries he deserved a chance again this year after his form in 2011.

I will remember him for 2011\. With his tackle breaking ability and a great offload he was a great prospect- hope the sharks can make him a better player than we did. Another player who went backwards this year due to whatever reason.

The way he played yesterday, he shouldn't be playing for any club for a year.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
First you said he was a good player, now you are saying he was a solid developing NRL player? Which one is it? There is a big difference.

He is an average player at best who played one good season of football.

He is slow for an outside back, he is a hog who rarely passes the ball and he's always been an average defender. And to say he had energy is just ridiculous, he's always looked lethargic on the field, even when in form.
Click to expand...

He was a good player.

The developing part is because I believe he had more in him.

Coming out now and creating threads about how you and others supposedly saw through the glowing misguided praise of this forum is nothing more then a self pleasuring exercise. So I hope it feels good for you.
 
@LaT said:
@hybrid_tiger said:
First you said he was a good player, now you are saying he was a solid developing NRL player? Which one is it? There is a big difference.

He is an average player at best who played one good season of football.

He is slow for an outside back, he is a hog who rarely passes the ball and he's always been an average defender. And to say he had energy is just ridiculous, he's always looked lethargic on the field, even when in form.

He was a good player.

The developing part is because I believe he had more in him.

Coming out now and creating threads about how you and others supposedly saw through the glowing misguided praise of this forum is nothing more then a self pleasuring exercise. So I hope it feels good for you.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

You're the one who had a go at me in the first place merely because I said Ayshford was always an average player at best, now you say it's self pleasure. Please. :crazy
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
@LaT said:
@hybrid_tiger said:
First you said he was a good player, now you are saying he was a solid developing NRL player? Which one is it? There is a big difference.

He is an average player at best who played one good season of football.

He is slow for an outside back, he is a hog who rarely passes the ball and he's always been an average defender. And to say he had energy is just ridiculous, he's always looked lethargic on the field, even when in form.

He was a good player.

The developing part is because I believe he had more in him.

Coming out now and creating threads about how you and others supposedly saw through the glowing misguided praise of this forum is nothing more then a self pleasuring exercise. So I hope it feels good for you.

You're the one who had a go at me in the first place merely because I said Ayshford was always an average player at best, now you say it's self pleasure. Please. :crazy
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Now now ladies… Hand bags down

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
@LaT said:
@hybrid_tiger said:
First you said he was a good player, now you are saying he was a solid developing NRL player? Which one is it? There is a big difference.

He is an average player at best who played one good season of football.

He is slow for an outside back, he is a hog who rarely passes the ball and he's always been an average defender. And to say he had energy is just ridiculous, he's always looked lethargic on the field, even when in form.

He was a good player.

The developing part is because I believe he had more in him.

Coming out now and creating threads about how you and others supposedly saw through the glowing misguided praise of this forum is nothing more then a self pleasuring exercise. So I hope it feels good for you.

You're the one who had a go at me in the first place merely because I said Ayshford was always an average player at best, now you say it's self pleasure. Please. :crazy
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

In the you end you were "merely" bagging a player, and I was "merely" disagreeing. Don't play the persecution card like others have.
 
Hard to argue. If he's in the team this week he better have his game with him because there's little doubt that based on that performance he should be dropped. Everything about his game was poor. For him to deliver that borders on unprofessional.
 
I said he was always an average player and I stand by that. You have tried to convince me that I'm wrong and that he was a good player but aside from an offload, you've presented no other footballing attributes Ayshford possesses to back up your opinion.

The best modern day centres are fast, evasive and good defenders and he is none of the above and never has been.
 
Worst player in the NRl.

Let in three tries and made the previously worst p,ayer in the NRL in Ben Roberts look like Joey.
\
\
Well done Aysh,

And for all the Potter fans, if Potter bad of had the sense to drop Ayshford like he shold have then we would have won. Dont blame the cap, there were a lotmof other options. Potter is going to cop it all week, but this time it is his own fault for picking Ayshford.

Anyway, well done Aysh. Worst player in the NRL and made Ben Roberts look great. Enormous quinella.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 5,288 (members: 3, guests: 5,285)
Back
Top