OFFICIAL Blake Ayshford [Discussion]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
LOL…youre saying a guy with a suspected broken hand is better than a fully fit player, abd if we play that fully fit player we'll be evening the ledger and not playing at a disadvantage by playing 16 on 17

Yeh, I dont have a clue
 
@innsaneink said:
LOL…youre saying a guy with a suspected broken hand is better than a fully fit player, abd if we play that fully fit player we'll be evening the ledger and not playing at a disadvantage by playing 16 on 17

**Yeh, I dont have a clue**

well diiiiiir!!!!!!!!
 
The whole thing just defeats the purpose of Daniella being there at all. Word gets back the the bench that Ayshford is injured and he would have been expected to be thrown into the game at any minute. Instead he stays on the bench for the game. Really we could have had another forward there who could have helped our cause against the big pack we were playing.
 
Ayshford had a chance to wrap the game up, simply picking up a loose ball on their tryline.

He couldnt mange that.

I bet daniella wouldve.

![](http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/object3/10/59/q95751720642_7101.jpg)

Doc probly jabbed the pick in his big toe.
 
yeah that's completely nuts, if he had a problem with his hand before half time…and you have a center sitting on the bench....why wouldn't you put him out?????? yeah they didn't know if it was definitely broken, but why take the risk you have a center on the bench???

Daniella saw no game time by the end of it anyway
 
because the doc wouldn't be speaking to sheens at all during the game nor at half time to say that there could be a injury with a player :unamused:

who the hell is saying it's the doc's fault???? surely sheens would have known…at the very least during the half time break.

If NO ONE said anything to Sheens about Blake's hand then there is obviously a communication problem, which isn't good either.
 
gee i think the decision was a simple one ….daniellas on the bench ,your run on centre is injured ,but this seems to be sheens way ... he dosent have confidence in certain players , and then he has too much in others ....its a no brainer when you sit a centre on the bench and your centre is injured .....
 
@Tigerdave said:
because the doc wouldn't be speaking to sheens at all during the game nor at half time to say that there could be a injury with a player :unamused:

who the hell is saying it's the doc's fault???? surely sheens would have known…at the very least during the half time break.

If NO ONE said anything to Sheens about Blake's hand then there is obviously a communication problem, which isn't good either.

just certain people who like to make up BS, who useally dont know facts or is just trying to bring down who ever they can cause they are unhappy in the world and not getting any at home…
 
@tiger tigers said:
gee i think the decision was a simple one ….daniellas on the bench ,your run on centre is injured ,but this seems to be sheens way ... he dosent have confidence in certain players , and then he has too much in others ....its a no brainer when you sit a centre on the bench and your centre is injured .....

Really makes no sense at all…playing 15 and a half against 17, a fully fit replacement doing far call for 80 mins
Ayshford was a liability in the 2nd half
 
Well I guess if there is a positive out of this…..well wemay get to see Daniella get a go in the centres.

I hope its not Brown,I dont rate him.
 
have geoff daniela in centres for rabbitohs game.
if results on blake hand show no major injury rest him until its right.
 
Maybe Daniela didn't get a run as supercoach is filthy that he wasn't allowed to select a certain other outside back that he prefers…
 
Hmmm….that suggests Sheens selections have been taken out of his control......

Unlikely...
 
@innsaneink said:
Ayshford had a chance to wrap the game up, simply picking up a loose ball on their tryline.

He couldnt mange that.

I bet daniella wouldve.

![](http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/object3/10/59/q95751720642_7101.jpg)

Doc probly jabbed the pick in his big toe.

If he got the needle in his hand then it explains why he knocked on…...
 
@tiger tigers said:
gee i think the decision was a simple one ….daniellas on the bench ,your run on centre is injured ,but this seems to be sheens way ... he dosent have confidence in certain players , and then he has too much in others ....its a no brainer when you sit a centre on the bench and your centre is injured .....

Look its another Sheens blunder….thought everyone would be used to them by now.
 
I think for the balance of our side it would be great to see Daniela start at Centre as he has so much pace, side step
and his defence has improved. Ayshford to move to the bench as our utility as he can cover the backs and forwards.

I would keep Brown at Fullback and my bench would be Fifita, Dwyer, Moors and Ayshford.

Starting pack would be Rhino, Fulton, Ellis, Gibbs, Farah and Payten.

Galloway needs some time in State Cup to get his fitness and form back then i would have him back in the starting side and Gibbs back to the bench. It would then be between Moors and Dwyer who would drop off the bench.

To me Moors adds a bit more than Dwyer at this stage of their careers.
 

Staff online

Members online

Back
Top