@geo said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377270) said:@aj1 said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377264) said:@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377173) said:@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377142) said:@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.
I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?
=
I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.
I understand you don't have a problem with it 🙂
I do get it when people are venting frustration and sometimes go too far (done it myself) but given the site does try to accommodate all ages, genders etc am glad there are standards.
Kul - what are your thoughts on it these days? Happy with whatever you decide but just seeking clarity so I can stay within the guidelines.
@Kul Good luck getting a response out of him. He won't engage with the moderators on here.
Engage with mods whatsoever or specifically on this thread? Given the number of years and thousands of hours moderating posts I certainly hope you're not talking about the former.
Former..
Wow