G
Guest
Guest
If @Kul has any commonsense he'll make the ban permanent. Demps has had more than enough chances on this forum and is unable to conform and post appropriately. Last night typified that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@getagrip said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376963) said:@gnr4life said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376948) said:He swore he was a reformed man. What did he do this time?
Has there been an undertone to some of his (many) posts since his return?
Those that know him better than me might be better placed to comment.
@willow said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377071) said:If @Kul has any commonsense he'll make the ban permanent. Demps has had more than enough chances on this forum and is unable to conform and post appropriately. Last night typified that.
@geo said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376976) said:@innsaneink said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376961) said:@telltails said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376909) said:I have no idea why Demps got banned but I have no problems with the way the site runs.
Love the site and the people that run it but some of the rules on swearing are quite hypocritical
I agree with you here as well @innsaneink and as far as I'm concerned You can BS FMD and FFS all you like ..I reckon personally that is fine for a footy forum so I certainly won't be deleting any of those anymore.. swear words in Capital..yes
@yossarian said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377084) said:@getagrip said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376963) said:@gnr4life said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376948) said:He swore he was a reformed man. What did he do this time?
Has there been an undertone to some of his (many) posts since his return?
Those that know him better than me might be better placed to comment.
He stepped over the line in a thread about a female NRL commentator. Kind of thing that is not acceptable in 2021 (if it ever was) and could open up the forum to legal issues. Just to be clear, it was about his views on her appearance.
@yossarian said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377084) said:@getagrip said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376963) said:@gnr4life said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376948) said:He swore he was a reformed man. What did he do this time?
Has there been an undertone to some of his (many) posts since his return?
Those that know him better than me might be better placed to comment.
He stepped over the line in a thread about a female NRL commentator. Kind of thing that is not acceptable in 2021 (if it ever was) and could open up the forum to legal issues. Just to be clear, it was about his views on her appearance.
@rihannafan1 said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377024) said:@brian said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376906) said:Apparently this is a privately owned site.
About time people realise the fans are the site. How about banning the half wit females the trolls and those comments too. Ban the trolls who repeatedly use negativity and abusive tones.
Banning people for a joke or a light hearted dig. I see why our pussy players can't perform pussy people running the show. Keep ur privately owned site for the trolls and halfwits and of course moderators.
lol mate what is your problem w females? There's like 1 on here and she's far from a halfwit, you might as well just call her out if you're going to do that so she can serve you up.
@tigerap said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376994) said:@telltails said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376909) said:I have no idea why Demps got banned but I have no problems with the way the site runs.
Mods here are like refs..inconsistent, but they do it voluntary....so become a Mod if you can do better
@rihannafan1 said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377024) said:@brian said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376906) said:Apparently this is a privately owned site.
About time people realise the fans are the site. How about banning the half wit females the trolls and those comments too. Ban the trolls who repeatedly use negativity and abusive tones.
Banning people for a joke or a light hearted dig. I see why our pussy players can't perform pussy people running the show. Keep ur privately owned site for the trolls and halfwits and of course moderators.
lol mate what is your problem w females? There's like 1 on here and she's far from a halfwit, you might as well just call her out if you're going to do that so she can serve you up.
@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.
I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?
=
@cultured_bogan said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377134) said:@rihannafan1 said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377024) said:@brian said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1376906) said:Apparently this is a privately owned site.
About time people realise the fans are the site. How about banning the half wit females the trolls and those comments too. Ban the trolls who repeatedly use negativity and abusive tones.
Banning people for a joke or a light hearted dig. I see why our pussy players can't perform pussy people running the show. Keep ur privately owned site for the trolls and halfwits and of course moderators.
lol mate what is your problem w females? There's like 1 on here and she's far from a halfwit, you might as well just call her out if you're going to do that so she can serve you up.
There's more than one, and none of them are halfwits.
@cochise said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377137) said:@mikey said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377131) said:While we are on this topic of appropriacy for the forum I have noticed a lot more posts with either disguised swearing or actual mild swearing not being deleted in the last three weeks or so.
I had a post with disguised deleted about a month ago - it deserved it if the rule is absolutely no swearing but now I'm a little confused. Is some disguised swearing acceptable? Is mild swearing acceptable?
Could we have clarification around that?
=
I can only really speak for myself but will no longer be deleting disguised swearing. It still breaches forum guidelines so if you do post in that manner you still run the risk of it being deleted.
@red88_tiger said in [Bring back the Demps](/post/1377070) said:What are the odds of getting banned after a win ?