@Irvine said:@alexaki said:Gibbs didn't leave on his own accord….
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
We all know that. But who was the guy that came up with the idea of signing Blair and getting rid of Gibbs ?
Sheens and/or Humphreys
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Irvine said:@alexaki said:Gibbs didn't leave on his own accord….
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
We all know that. But who was the guy that came up with the idea of signing Blair and getting rid of Gibbs ?
@Tigerdale said:i'm going to stick up for Humpty and Sheens here.
we let go of Gibbs who was on (reportedly) 400k a year, and signed a mature, experienced prop in Matt Bell, who was voted by nearly every single member of this forum as the signing of the year in another thread this week, who is on less than half of what Gibbs was on.
30 yo props who are signing their final contract before retirement should not be on 400k. FACT.
i understand that he was a Magpie junior, i understand he was loved by a stack of Wests Tigers fans, but at the end of the day, having Bryce Gibbs - 400k in our salary cap is not helping the club in the long run.
\
\
all this talk about signing Blair to replace Gibbs is nonsense, because he wasn't.
and the only reason we are talking about it is because Galloway is injured, and Blair hasn't lived up to the price tag yet.
@Tigerdale said:i'm going to stick up for Humpty and Sheens here.
we let go of Gibbs who was on (reportedly) 400k a year, and signed a mature, experienced prop in Matt Bell, who was voted by nearly every single member of this forum as the signing of the year in another thread this week, who is on less than half of what Gibbs was on.
30 yo props who are signing their final contract before retirement should not be on 400k. FACT.
i understand that he was a Magpie junior, i understand he was loved by a stack of Wests Tigers fans, but at the end of the day, having Bryce Gibbs - 400k in our salary cap is not helping the club in the long run.
\
\
all this talk about signing Blair to replace Gibbs is nonsense, because he wasn't.
and the only reason we are talking about it is because Galloway is injured, and Blair hasn't lived up to the price tag yet.
@hybrid_tiger said:@Tigerdale said:i'm going to stick up for Humpty and Sheens here.
we let go of Gibbs who was on (reportedly) 400k a year, and signed a mature, experienced prop in Matt Bell, who was voted by nearly every single member of this forum as the signing of the year in another thread this week, who is on less than half of what Gibbs was on.
30 yo props who are signing their final contract before retirement should not be on 400k. FACT.
i understand that he was a Magpie junior, i understand he was loved by a stack of Wests Tigers fans, but at the end of the day, having Bryce Gibbs - 400k in our salary cap is not helping the club in the long run.
\
\
all this talk about signing Blair to replace Gibbs is nonsense, because he wasn't.
and the only reason we are talking about it is because Galloway is injured, and Blair hasn't lived up to the price tag yet.
How do you know Gibbs was on 400K?
No way in the world that is true.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
@smeghead said:Did I hear correctly that Ray Freaking Hadley is part of the panel to select the next Immortal?
@cktiger said:@smeghead said:Did I hear correctly that Ray Freaking Hadley is part of the panel to select the next Immortal?
…and our Shark loving friend from the Telegraph
@Swordy said:I too watched the footy show and remember how much Gibbsy contributed on and off the field.
But lets get fair dinkum here.
GIBBSY HAD A CONTRACT, COULD HAVE STAYED AND WOULD HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL !!
HE WAS NOT SACKED!!!
He chose to move on and it was his choice.
There will of course be people on here who hold the belief that if you're told to look around, your job is finished. THAT IS CRAP. He could have stayed, played his guts out, been in a position where they had to pick him. To say he would have played out his 3 years in park football is just absolute crap.
I miss Bryce and I'm sure the team does, just as much as anyone else on here. But he ultimately made the choice, OF HIS OWN ACCORD to leave and we should accept that and move on. Others were told they could look elsewhere but STAYED. Bryce didn't for his own reasons, and I wish him nothing but absolute success. I hope he make the decision to come back one day. END OF STORY
@innsaneink said:@Swordy said:I too watched the footy show and remember how much Gibbsy contributed on and off the field.
But lets get fair dinkum here.
GIBBSY HAD A CONTRACT, COULD HAVE STAYED AND WOULD HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL !!
HE WAS NOT SACKED!!!
He chose to move on and it was his choice.
There will of course be people on here who hold the belief that if you're told to look around, your job is finished. THAT IS CRAP. He could have stayed, played his guts out, been in a position where they had to pick him. To say he would have played out his 3 years in park football is just absolute crap.
I miss Bryce and I'm sure the team does, just as much as anyone else on here. But he ultimately made the choice, OF HIS OWN ACCORD to leave and we should accept that and move on. Others were told they could look elsewhere but STAYED. Bryce didn't for his own reasons, and I wish him nothing but absolute success. I hope he make the decision to come back one day. END OF STORY
Doesnt change the fact he was urged to go, look around….ie: not wanted!
Pretty stupid knocking back an offer of a club that WANTS you to stay somewhere where clearly you'll possibly be on the outer
The club made the ultimate choice, not Gibbs
10 years service is very rare, when our other players are getting their awards for this at years end, it will be a hollow moment because Gibbs shouldve been there with em
@Centaur said:Gibbs wanted more money - Tigers wouldn't give it, Sharks would.
Simple equation.
.
@cnx_tigers said:@Centaur said:Gibbs wanted more money - Tigers wouldn't give it, Sharks would.
Simple equation.
.
Completely wrong mate. He had already signed a contract and agreed to the terms. Money was redundant at that point.
You are completely wrong.
The issue was a month AFTER signing a contract when he was called in an told "you are free to leave".
Sure he could have stayed…but how many people woul want to after their boss and coach have told them they are not wanted? This is all on Humphreys and Sheens.