Cam smith

@ said:
only thing i thought should have been pulled up was the kick out from the Qld player, i think it was Milford? it looked intentional to me.

Yes that looked bad. Im surprised we havent heard more from it. He seemed to get him in the face.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Agree - Tedesco went straight through the hole Smith left by not sliding hard enough, very uncharacteristic I thought but maybe father time is finally catching up?

He is 34 soon.

Are you saying he is too old?

If he is, then he should retire.

As the saying goes "if the kitchen is too hot, get out of the kitchen."

Not at all. He starred for the Kangaroos not long ago. He'll bounce back.
You got your saying wrong as well…

There is very few International games played at the intensity of a SOO. They will always find you out, that is why it is the epitome of Rugby League.

No I didn't get the saying wrong - it is my saying. Lol
 
@ said:
@ said:
only thing i thought should have been pulled up was the kick out from the Qld player, i think it was Milford? it looked intentional to me.

Yes that looked bad. Im surprised we havent heard more from it. He seemed to get him in the face.

we shouldn't water down SOO it needs to be tough and there is going to be a few shots that are borderline that will be let go, but kicking out thats just not on.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
100% correct Harvey. This was Nate's fault. Regardless, after years of leading with the head he deserved from bad karma. :slight_smile:

:laughing: you blind fools.

Why? The easy option is to insult but provide no evidence to contrary. I eagerly await your well thought out response.

Yours in anticipation,

pdenny77.

Well it is perfectly simple. Nate was on his side and Cordner came over the top of him wrenching his arm into a chicken wing. Cant believe i have to explain that.

Wow. OK, I'll break it down. Google "hearsay". Your words alone (as clever as I am sure you are :unamused: ) are not considered evidence. Re-watch the video…..maybe 5 times in your case.

I can't believe I have to explain that.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
He is 34 soon.

Are you saying he is too old?

If he is, then he should retire.

As the saying goes "if the kitchen is too hot, get out of the kitchen."

Not at all. He starred for the Kangaroos not long ago. He'll bounce back.
You got your saying wrong as well…

There is very few International games played at the intensity of a SOO. They will always find you out, that is why it is the epitome of Rugby League.

No I didn't get the saying wrong - it is my saying. Lol

Firstly the saying is 'if you cant stand the heat, get out of the kitchen'. Your version of it makes no sense. Secondly the saying means 'if you arent prepared to face the pressures of a task/job, then dont take it on'. Thirdly, do you really think that applies here?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
:laughing: you blind fools.

Why? The easy option is to insult but provide no evidence to contrary. I eagerly await your well thought out response.

Yours in anticipation,

pdenny77.

Well it is perfectly simple. Nate was on his side and Cordner came over the top of him wrenching his arm into a chicken wing. Cant believe i have to explain that.

Wow. OK, I'll break it down. Google "hearsay". Your words alone (as clever as I am sure you are :unamused: ) are not considered evidence. Re-watch the video…..maybe 5 times in your case.

I can't believe I have to explain that.

Try using your own advice. We are both giving our opinion. Its just yours is wrong.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Why? The easy option is to insult but provide no evidence to contrary. I eagerly await your well thought out response.

Yours in anticipation,

pdenny77.

Well it is perfectly simple. Nate was on his side and Cordner came over the top of him wrenching his arm into a chicken wing. Cant believe i have to explain that.

Wow. OK, I'll break it down. Google "hearsay". Your words alone (as clever as I am sure you are :unamused: ) are not considered evidence. Re-watch the video…..maybe 5 times in your case.

I can't believe I have to explain that.

Try using your own advice. We are both giving our opinion. Its just yours is wrong.

I have used my own advice. I watched the video ten times instead though, just so I could be certain of how wrong you are and have come to the logical conclusion that you watched the game through one maroon eye.
You know what they say about opinions…...
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Well it is perfectly simple. Nate was on his side and Cordner came over the top of him wrenching his arm into a chicken wing. Cant believe i have to explain that.

Wow. OK, I'll break it down. Google "hearsay". Your words alone (as clever as I am sure you are :unamused: ) are not considered evidence. Re-watch the video…..maybe 5 times in your case.

I can't believe I have to explain that.

Try using your own advice. We are both giving our opinion. Its just yours is wrong.

I have used my own advice. I watched the video ten times instead though, just so I could be certain of how wrong you are and have come to the logical conclusion that you watched the game through one maroon eye.
You know what they say about opinions…...

Oh I see…you have watched it 10 times? why didnt you say so? my mistake.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Wow. OK, I'll break it down. Google "hearsay". Your words alone (as clever as I am sure you are :unamused: ) are not considered evidence. Re-watch the video…..maybe 5 times in your case.

I can't believe I have to explain that.

Try using your own advice. We are both giving our opinion. Its just yours is wrong.

I have used my own advice. I watched the video ten times instead though, just so I could be certain of how wrong you are and have come to the logical conclusion that you watched the game through one maroon eye.
You know what they say about opinions…...

Oh I see…you have watched it 10 times? why didnt you say so? my mistake.

Everyone makes mistakes. Well, almost everyone. It's only valuable if you learn from it. Perhaps I could send you a DVD of the 2005 Origin series to try and convert you? What a year….....
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Try using your own advice. We are both giving our opinion. Its just yours is wrong.

I have used my own advice. I watched the video ten times instead though, just so I could be certain of how wrong you are and have come to the logical conclusion that you watched the game through one maroon eye.
You know what they say about opinions…...

Oh I see…you have watched it 10 times? why didnt you say so? my mistake.

Everyone makes mistakes. Well, almost everyone. It's only valuable if you learn from it. Perhaps I could send you a DVD of the 2005 Origin series to try and convert you? What a year….....

Ok cheers. Ill send you dvd's from 2006,'07,'08,'09,'10,'11,'12,'13,'15 and '16 you are paying freight though.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I have used my own advice. I watched the video ten times instead though, just so I could be certain of how wrong you are and have come to the logical conclusion that you watched the game through one maroon eye.
You know what they say about opinions…...

Oh I see…you have watched it 10 times? why didnt you say so? my mistake.

Everyone makes mistakes. Well, almost everyone. It's only valuable if you learn from it. Perhaps I could send you a DVD of the 2005 Origin series to try and convert you? What a year….....

Ok cheers. Ill send you dvd's from 2006,'07,'08,'09,'10,'11,'12,'13,'15 and '16 you are paying freight though.

Nah, it's like watching a poorly written suspense/horror movie. So predictable. Actually just send me game 3, 2009 because I want to see Steve Price get knocked out. Please don't mention Ben Creagh, it's something we don't speak of.
 
Back
Top