S
system
Guest
I think long term with the stadium strategy the State Goverment is pushing we will end up
2 x CSS games
2 x LO games
7 x ANZ games
2 x CSS games
2 x LO games
7 x ANZ games
Campbelltown Club Supporters…
- Thread starter azsportza
- Start date
S
system
Guest
@smeghead said:
I'd be happier with that. It's fair on both parties, and financially beneficial to the club. It's a sad reality, but life goes on.
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
S
system
Guest
@Anonymous said:
And that will be the end to my membership !
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
If and when Leichhardt is deemed unfit:
6 x Ctown
6 x Anz/SFS
Just because the club might be forced out of LO doesn't mean Ctown should suffer as well. Nothing wrong with the ground. As long as Parra and Penrith are playing 12 games a yr at their home grounds, theres no reason why we can't play 6\. We have to maintain some kind of significant presence in the area. Plying only 2 games when every other game could be potentially in the inner city is not good enough.
6 x Ctown
6 x Anz/SFS
Just because the club might be forced out of LO doesn't mean Ctown should suffer as well. Nothing wrong with the ground. As long as Parra and Penrith are playing 12 games a yr at their home grounds, theres no reason why we can't play 6\. We have to maintain some kind of significant presence in the area. Plying only 2 games when every other game could be potentially in the inner city is not good enough.
S
system
Guest
It isn't about parity in my scenario.
The State Government wants the big stadiums to be the focus and Parramatta has already been revealed as the choice for funding.
As such I believe there will be larger incentives across the board to play more games at the bigger venues .
Being forced out of Leichhardt isn't an issue for me. We will always play some games there every year. Of that I have no doubt simply because of previous turnout etc.
The State Government wants the big stadiums to be the focus and Parramatta has already been revealed as the choice for funding.
As such I believe there will be larger incentives across the board to play more games at the bigger venues .
Being forced out of Leichhardt isn't an issue for me. We will always play some games there every year. Of that I have no doubt simply because of previous turnout etc.
tigermaniac
Well-known member
@GNR4LIFE said:
I totally agree. But my split would be 7 @ Campbelltown and 5 @ ANZ or SFS. I would give the highest bidder all 5 games, we don't need 2 neutral homes.
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
tigerbenji
Well-known member
Bad weather, Bad scheduling, Bad results on the Field. I have been to all home games & sometimes when going to L.O i cant get a parking spot but i love the atmosphere there & i live @ Bradbury near Campbelltown. The games @ Campbelltown i would like to see different Teams play there against the Tigers.
@Anonymous said:
5 games at SFS or ANZ is still inner west / inner city (same as LO) so you don't have to travel to campbelltown 12 times a year only 5\. If Balmain was still in NRL as a stand alone team they would be most likely playing all games at SFS or ANZ just like Bulldogs left Belmore for $$ at the two stadiums.
being an original balmain supporter should have nothing to do with it. South West sydney is a growth area with big population, junior talent and a good stadium. WT must embrace it.
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
S
system
Guest
@Anonymous said:
Mate I'm from the central coast also and have a membership to all home games. I travel to all Sydney away games also. Since they have upgraded the roads out to campbelltown it is actually much quicker now.. I've got to campbelltown games in quicker time than I have sfs games!! It definitely is not a 6 hour round trip from the central coast!!
_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
