CLEANOUT~?

Moltzen might actually be handy on a base level contract. If he wants more than starting level he can POQ.

I could handle losing Galloway if there is a replacement of suitable quality. I wouldn't shaft him for the sake of it.
 
When the Austin to Canberra rumour surfaced it was also said we are looking to offload Buchanan, Rowe, Luani and Moltzen
 
I think lodge, brown and Ava can easily replace Galloway. He doesn't being much to the table even with his frame and experience.

After losing Austin, I don't think we should let moltzen go. Also, anasta retired so we've lost 2 5/8 without signing one.

_Posted using RoarFEED_
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
Moltzen might actually be handy on a base level contract. If he wants more than starting level he can POQ.

I could handle losing Galloway if there is a replacement of suitable quality. I wouldn't shaft him for the sake of it.

What's POQ mate ?

_Posted using RoarFEED_
 
@Demps said:
Who's next?

Well seeing we let Austin go , we might as well let Tedesco ,Brooks ,Woods , Farah and Taupau go

Oh that's right we still haven't signed Tedesco because we made a promise to him we haven't so far kept (5 months later mind you )

If we can't find the money now to sign Tedesco , something is seriously still wrong with this club
 
@hobbo2803 said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
Moltzen might actually be handy on a base level contract. If he wants more than starting level he can POQ.

I could handle losing Galloway if there is a replacement of suitable quality. I wouldn't shaft him for the sake of it.

What's POQ mate ?

_Posted using RoarFEED_

Piss off quick(ly)
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@hobbo2803 said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
Moltzen might actually be handy on a base level contract. If he wants more than starting level he can POQ.

I could handle losing Galloway if there is a replacement of suitable quality. I wouldn't shaft him for the sake of it.

What's POQ mate ?

_Posted using RoarFEED_

Piss off quick(ly)

Lol thx !

_Posted using RoarFEED_
 
@happy tiger said:
@Demps said:
Who's next?

Well seeing we let Austin go , we might as well let Tedesco ,Brooks ,Woods , Farah and Taupau go

Oh that's right we still haven't signed Tedesco because we made a promise to him we haven't so far kept (5 months later mind you )

If we can't find the money now to sign Tedesco , something is seriously still wrong with this club

Do you ever stop bitching?

It is obvious that you do not like what is going on at Weststigers, so why don't you go and follow another club and give us all a break.
 
Magpiecol,Happy has stated the obvious,if we can't sign up teddy after 5months then something is wrong,he is an important part of the spine.
We need to put a squad in place ASAP so we can start planning for next season… :smiley: :sign:
 
I don't care what BS Mayer spins out the fact is we don't use all of our salary cap and therefore we are always going to be behind other clubs.
What we might see as failures are what Mayer presents to the board as savings.
 
@Irvine said:
I don't care what BS Mayer spins out the fact is we don't use all of our salary cap and therefore we are always going to be behind other clubs.
What we might see as failures are what Mayer presents to the board as savings.

Can you name me the illustrious names left that are not yet signed for 2015 we should be targetting?By releasing all these players it allows us to rework our cap for 2015 so it gives us extra space for 2016.Quite frankly who would of wanted to come here for 2015 after the season we had last year anyhow.We would of had to pay massive overs for players.Let Taylor right this ship in 2015 and then we will be looked more favorably as a free agent destination in 2016.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
Moltzen might actually be handy on a base level contract. If he wants more than starting level he can POQ.

I could handle losing Galloway if there is a replacement of suitable quality. I wouldn't shaft him for the sake of it.

What is a base level contract?..

Moltzen will be into the 3rd year of his current contract he signed in 2013\. I'm sure is not "base level" as you put it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top