Crowds attendance

Tiger_heart

Well-known member
How much do they really matter these days? They represent, for the clubs, a small revenue stream, and are nowhere near the more important TV/media ratings.
Think of the sale of 30 seconds of prime advertising time in a nationwide broadcast of the SOO or the sale of a team’s logo or endorsement of a product.
Yes, crowds provide a "spectacle" to the eye, they help keep the game real, and believable. But there are plenty of studies to suggest that they don't have an impact on player's performance. They have far too many other things to concentrate on when they take the field.
So can RL today survive without the fans in the stands? There is some question whether the entertainment value of the sport might be as great without that sense of live action that the fan attendance provides the viewing audience. However, prior history (see Covid) tends to imply that it could well endure with games played in empty arenas. Other forms of entertainment have long managed to adapt to such transitions - opera and dramatic theater have managed to thrive despite such changes. So we might expect RL to adapt to them as well. Won't be to everyone's liking, but may be unavoidable.
 
It would surely be a barometer of overall interest in the club? So high attendance should correlate with strong TV ratings for that same club?

Also I don't think it's an insignificant revenue stream for a club. TV revenues are spread across all clubs, but clubs pocket their own ticket sales (minus costs of course).

What I really wanted to say about this is apparently there were 10K odd people at the Storm game but only 8K something at the Titans game, and for sure the crowds looked basically the same; in fact I felt the Titans match filled in more of the corners of LO but was somehow a few thousand short.
 
Could be a good thing. Sport is a distraction. Fun. Like they did in Rome. Entertain the masses. They are so fickle. Whilst they are distracted we will move on with our agenda. Roman Empire. Caeser.

 
Could be a good thing. Sport is a distraction. Fun. Like they did in Rome. Entertain the masses. They are so fickle. Whilst they are distracted we will move on with our agenda. Roman Empire. Caeser.

You realise Noam is salty because he was last picked for touch footy in the playground, right?
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top