David Fifita missus centrelink rort

[Byron_Bay_Fan]

There are kids involved, no chance of prison time.

You would think paying it back with a criminal record would be all that's required.

Concerning the crim record part is it really necessary? Did her circumstances change and it was non-reporting of new situation that caused the overpayment or was it blatant deception from the beginning?

I know guys who got crim records over driving offences, losing licenses etc. over DUI or speeding, and it wrecks their whole lives and they are only youngsters. They then can become a big burden on the taxpayer for years. I am aware that driving offences prevents serious injury and lives being wiped out but I would prefer a less devastating result for the offender. The real answer is not to allow youngsters get licenses until aged 28, that is when total maturity is supposed to occur by.

 

[Fade_To_Black]

There are kids involved, no chance of prison time.

You would think paying it back with a criminal record would be all that's required.

I'm sure that is all that will be required- our weak as pee justice system will guarantee that.
It is worth the risk IMO if all you get punished with is having to give the money back. There is no deterrent whatsoever there. The only downside of having a criminal record is when it comes time for a job interview: which you would think won't ever be a concern for the parasitic, leeching bludger who this thread is about.
No wonder welfare rorting is so common in today's society with there being no punishment or deterrent.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

There are kids involved, no chance of prison time.

You would think paying it back with a criminal record would be all that's required.

Concerning the crim record part is it really necessary? Did her circumstances change and it was non-reporting of new situation that caused the overpayment or was it blatant deception from the beginning?

I know guys who got crim records over driving offences, losing licenses etc. over DUI or speeding, and it wrecks their whole lives and they are only youngsters. They then can become a big burden on the taxpayer for years. I am aware that driving offences prevents serious injury and lives being wiped out but I would prefer a less devastating result for the offender. The real answer is not to allow youngsters get licenses until aged 28, that is when total maturity is supposed to occur by.

If total maturity is meant to be hit by the age of 28, why do so many drivers go DUI, get busted speeding etc past that age?

 

[Gary_Bakerloo]

Concerning the crim record part is it really necessary? Did her circumstances change and it was non-reporting of new situation that caused the overpayment or was it blatant deception from the beginning?

I guess that would be for the courts to decide. There are zero facts in the article so this is all speculation, I just think prison time will be out of the question due to children being involved.