@Yossarian said:
@Swordy said:
It's a way to raise money to cover for the waste and needless expenditure.
Some of it is the right thinking, but wrong time, wrong place, wrong everything else.
As I understand it most if not practically all of the money raised is being redistributed in the form of tax breaks to individuals and to boost renewable energy.
Some money is being returned back to low income earners in the form of tax breaks. Apparently I earn too much and will not be getting a single cent.
This is despite the fact that I have used my 'untold wealth' to insulate my house, put in solar hot water, some solar panels on the roof to a limit that I can afford. If I had more money, I'd put more on!
Yet, Wayne who lives down the road and has 3 kids and earns 35K a year and has made no attempt to direct any of his income toward energy efficient living, gets some tax breaks.
How is that fair?
You see, Wayne and I went school together. His Mum & Dad still live together and mine split when I was a kid meaning I came from a single parent family.
Wayne left in year 10, smoked a bit of grass, partied hard and then decided to knuckle down when he got his girlfriend pregnant at 18\. He has since had two more kids and after being in and out of jobs for the past 20 years, has held his factory job for the past 3 years.
Silly me on the other hand stayed in school and finished year 12, worked two jobs until I was 20 and then spent another 20 in the same, respectable job and worked my way up the ladder. I married at 27 and have two girls.
Nothing wrong with either lifestyle choice and Wayne and I remain best mates to this day! Yet Wayne gets a lot of family and health benefits and now gets more tax breaks because of a carbon tax. I get zero.
This scenario is 100% true.
I'm all for helping out the battlers, but there has to be some fairness in the way the carbon tax is worked, and in the current world climate, is the timing right anyway?