Dugan 1st Try

Bismark

New member
What the hell happened here. OK, should have been tackled and held, but regardless, what was with that decision???

Woods in the 2nd half had the ball "striped" from him and the scrum was given to the Raiders. I'm at a loss with that call.
 
Or when we got penalised for pushing Dugan back into his in goal line Ashley Klein said "the ball touched the ground so that makes him tackled." How many times did the ball touch the ground when he was trying to score his first try??
 
As i said when a few were saying about warriors no try against us…..i wasnt concerned cause i knew we will get a few go against us and we have its now our turn to get one.lol
 
Refs calls today were beyond a joke.. Tim Sheens should get up those idiots !!! Oh and he should also get up Tim mol-hog the centre we have that hoged it every time he got the ball !! Besides that on ya boyz!!!
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
 
For the first time in a long while I started taking notes on the game, well for the first 10 minutes or so when I thought everything was going against us then…..........................
 
sometimes the calls go against you in a game.
Dugan's try was dubious at extremely best
what was most pleasing to see about it was, that wests-tigers did not sook about it.
they moved on, focused and end result was a decent score in their favour at the end of the game.
 
offside, several knock ons and it was awarded. if that was given, galloways one should have been too
 
should have been 49 zip but the clowns witg pea again threatened to ruin a decent game of footy. in trepidation of the finals
 
I was ok with the Try call to be honest. I thought the ball was stripped
 
Lets put it this way Be interesting to see what Harrigan has to say about both tries Especially with the forward passes that did get pulled up . I can't understand how it was awarded without a BOD call attached . Anyway we won and won well thats the important thing
 
I thought he was offside from the kick (in front of the leg of the kicker touching the ground), held, a knock-on when benji pulled his hand (and possibly contacted the ball, but still a knock on IMO), and finally a knock on when the ball was lost on the ground before he picked it up. Benefit of the doubt to the attacker sure, but how much doubt is reasonable?
 
that was one of the most horrible decisions i have seen this year… WOW....

this stripping rule is so messed up. sometimes its a knock on sometimes its play on, you can differentiate what is ok and what's not. its getting too complicated.
 
If technically it is a try, which I heard this morning then, the interpretation needs to be changed.

And forgetting the knock on surely he was held as well.

We got one last year, FIfita lost it at the line and robbie (i think) put is hand on it and it was awarded, disgraceful.
 
Back
Top