Should be nicknamed Mount Eisenhuth!
I like the variety he provides, as happy said he can ball play at the line, I think with the desperation of trying to stay up the top the team had shelved a little of their tricks, there was one instance where Eisenhuth could of gone out wide to the right against Parra, like we did last year for an Essan Marsters try at Leichhardt but instead he took the tackle.
Cleary likes a mix in his Front row a bit of impact with stability.
Grant is a similar player to Eisenhuth and Twal and I’d say due to risk of not having a balance of impact and stability that’s why his not playing.
I don't think they are similar at all tbh mate.
Grant (at his best) charges hard, is slow laterally, can be lazy at marker and defends well front on.
Twal Is a prodigy nearly 100% effective in defence, does his job in attack. Never seen him do two bad things in a game.
The huth has a better passing game than both, but can be easily put on his back or fall off a tackle. Best value is long minutes, because he is fit enough to be consistent for twice as long as Grant and 50% longer than Twal, and I think he is better suited as a lock with a licence to pass the ball. The other two are only suited to prop.
Just to be clear, he makes some great runs and defence is mostly solid, but he can get dominated on his first hit up or two and that can set the tone.
Just my opinion of course.