For crying out loud - rorters rorts

softlaw

Well-known member
another disaster for rugby league
http://www.smh.com.au/news/lhqnews/results-fixed-in-betting-swindle/2009/09/25/1253813612017.html

Results 'fixed' in betting swindle

Eamonn Duff, Jessica Halloran and Jacquelin Magnay | September 26, 2009

THE Sydney Roosters are bracing for a police investigation into an alleged betting scam surrounding the rugby league club's last home game of the season.

A bitter split has emerged at the eastern suburbs club over the circumstances of the round 26 game between the Roosters and the North Queensland Cowboys at the Sydney Football Stadium.

Bookmakers suspended betting three times before the game after a splurge of bets backed the Cowboys to win by more than 13 points. Extraordinarily, there was little interest in a straight Cowboys win.

The Herald is aware of one punter who outlaid $1500 after hearing, through Roosters associates, that a 13-point-plus loss was ''a sure thing''. He cashed in after the Roosters surrendered a 16-0 half-time lead to lose 32-16.

In the weeks since the September 6 game, players have been pointing fingers at each other and ostracising some teammates.

They are furious that a small group of Roosters ''celebrated'' the loss by visiting a brothel and enjoying the free services of prostitutes.

One player openly accused a teammate of getting some kind of kickback. ''I'm aware that several of the players have been up there [to the brothel] on a weekly basis throughout the year.

''On occasions they are receiving free services. I don't know why or how that works. Why you would want to involve yourself in those types of circles when you are a professional sportsman, I do not know.''

The player told the Herald he was stunned by claims within the club that results were being manipulated. But on reflection, he noted there was one player ''who would do it'', adding several others were young and impressionable. ''Now, looking back, I can't say that it didn't happen.''

Questions have been raised about several games but it is the circumstances surrounding the final home game that has everyone talking.

On the morning of the match, The Sun-Herald revealed that the nation's biggest sports agency, TAB Sportsbet, had suspended betting because of the weight of money on the Cowboys winning by more than 13 points.

''We've got a lot of worries about the betting activity on this game,'' a TAB spokesman, Glenn Munsie, said at the time.

Sources close to the club claim there has been an arrangement in place for several years involving a Roosters scout who offers to supplement the wages of younger players with bonus payments in order to aid exotic bets.

The source said that because those requests were not intended to alter the end result (rather influencing the losing margins or the half-time result), it was easier to draw the youngsters in.
''It's been happening for years. You can take it as being 120 per cent,'' he said.

The Roosters chief executive, Steve Noyce, said if every rumour in the code was investigated it would be a full-time job and that was not really the club's function.

''Brothels are legal. I am not aware of any specific allegation that any Roosters people are owed favours,'' he said. ''The bookies were stung and suddenly the talk is that players are throwing games.''

Under NRL rules it is illegal for players and officials to be involved in betting. It is also incumbent on anyone with information to come forward.

The NRL chief executive, David Gallop, said the NRL had initiated some early inquiries about the match - the only time it had done so all season - but did not have sufficient information to launch an investigation.

''If there was information, of course we would look at it and we would expect co-operation from the authorities.''

NSW police are adamant that nobody within their ranks has officially contacted the club and that a complaint from the public has not been lodged.

But the Herald understands at least one senior Roosters official has received a phone call from someone claiming to be from the police and warning them that players could be quizzed.
 
Hehe gotta love it because its the Roosters.

Im sure Noycey is wishing he hadnt joined them by now.

I dont think much will come of this but we'll wait and see.

Fancy throwing a match when it was Fitzys last game, even Freddy's, hell imagine being one of the fans that turned up only to find out later it was fixed!
 
i honestly saw nothing but a cowboys 13+ victory even at 16-6 i had $50 on the cowboys at $3.10 just to win at half time in the live betting, its funny how bookies cry foul when they get taken, i mean come on, cowboys giving up -2.5 against the worst team in the comp, they were asking to be taken lol.
 
If you offer odds of >$3 for the team in last to get smashed (13+), especially a team as pathetic as the Roosters, of course punters are going to put all sorts of money on it. They've got nothing other than "suspicious better patterns" when the odds made it feel like they were giving money away.
 
@Marshall_magic said:
If you offer odds of >$3 for the team in last to get smashed (13+), especially a team as pathetic as the Roosters, of course punters are going to put all sorts of money on it. They've got nothing other than "suspicious better patterns" when the odds made it feel like they were giving money away.

at the start of the week they opened up the cowboys as $1.30 favorites head to head, 13+ was $2.80, now im a man who like odds and if the TAB are gonna put the cowboys as $1.30 favorites they are saying that they think they will win comfortably im gonna jump on the 13+ @$2.80\. it only makes sense to do that.

By the weekend the 13+ was into $1.60 now thats a huge amount of money to bring in the price to $1.60 and by the time the game started it was $1.45, the tab dont often get it wrong but this time they did, i admit i was nervous when the roosters led 16-0 but if the cowboys hadnt come back and won by 13+ would there be an investigation? No there wouldnt they would of took all the punters money and not give 2 craps about it.
 
@anderson silva said:
@Marshall_magic said:
If you offer odds of >$3 for the team in last to get smashed (13+), especially a team as pathetic as the Roosters, of course punters are going to put all sorts of money on it. They've got nothing other than "suspicious better patterns" when the odds made it feel like they were giving money away.

at the start of the week they opened up the cowboys as $1.30 favorites head to head, 13+ was $2.80, now im a man who like odds and if the TAB are gonna put the cowboys as $1.30 favorites they are saying that they think they will win comfortably im gonna jump on the 13+ @$2.80\. it only makes sense to do that.

By the weekend the 13+ was into $1.60 now thats a huge amount of money to bring in the price to $1.60 and by the time the game started it was $1.45, the tab dont often get it wrong but this time they did, i admit i was nervous when the roosters led 16-0 but if the cowboys hadnt come back and won by 13+ would there be an investigation? No there wouldnt they would of took all the punters money and not give 2 craps about it.

I wasn't quite sure of the odds, I thought the Roosters were favourites, all I could really remember was the Cowboys 13+ was an absolute steal.
 
@Marshall_magic said:
@anderson silva said:
@Marshall_magic said:
If you offer odds of >$3 for the team in last to get smashed (13+), especially a team as pathetic as the Roosters, of course punters are going to put all sorts of money on it. They've got nothing other than "suspicious better patterns" when the odds made it feel like they were giving money away.

at the start of the week they opened up the cowboys as $1.30 favorites head to head, 13+ was $2.80, now im a man who like odds and if the TAB are gonna put the cowboys as $1.30 favorites they are saying that they think they will win comfortably im gonna jump on the 13+ @$2.80\. it only makes sense to do that.

By the weekend the 13+ was into $1.60 now thats a huge amount of money to bring in the price to $1.60 and by the time the game started it was $1.45, the tab dont often get it wrong but this time they did, i admit i was nervous when the roosters led 16-0 but if the cowboys hadnt come back and won by 13+ would there be an investigation? No there wouldnt they would of took all the punters money and not give 2 craps about it.

I wasn't quite sure of the odds, I thought the Roosters were favourites, all I could really remember was the Cowboys 13+ was an absolute steal.

cowboys were favorites, i dont know how they got it so wrong though, maybe instead of looking at the NRL players maybe they should be looking at some of the odds makers in there corporation.
 
@anderson silva said:
@Juro said:
If a prosititute doesn't charge, isn't it just casual sex?

its like if you have sex with a prositute and you refuse to pay is it considered theft? can you get charged for theft for that? lol

No they dont charge you what happens is a few bikies turn up and give you one last chance to cough up before they do some tap dancing on your brain…......or so I've heard :wink:
 
Just a thought, if these allegations are true (and that's a big if) and the Roosters have had players throwing games all year, you'd have to feel sorry for Brad Fittler who lost his job over their results wouldn't you?
 
@Marshall_magic said:
Just a thought, if these allegations are true (and that's a big if) and the Roosters have had players throwing games all year, you'd have to feel sorry for Brad Fittler who lost his job over their results wouldn't you?

I don't think the results were the only reason he lost his job.
 
@alien said:
@Marshall_magic said:
Just a thought, if these allegations are true (and that's a big if) and the Roosters have had players throwing games all year, you'd have to feel sorry for Brad Fittler who lost his job over their results wouldn't you?

I don't think the results were the only reason he lost his job.

yeah the townsville incident didnt help, but i find it ironic that these player cant drink beers yet most clubs take sponsorship off alcohol companies

the best one was ricky ponting after symonds got in trouble for drinking - here he is saying that it was unacceptable while sitting infront of a camera with a VB hat on and VB logos on his shirt.

sorry for the off topic rant
 
Back
Top