Foxsports stats - Tigers V Chooks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
![46356c40-6502-4b02-87e8-f94dec76d187-image.png](/assets/uploads/files/1598088394927-46356c40-6502-4b02-87e8-f94dec76d187-image.png)
 
Packer: 3 runs for 16m

Says it all really.

Our forwards don't do enough work. To win games you need multiple guys hitting over 100m in the forwards. One out running from the backs isn't going to win us shit.
 
Packer: 3 runs for 16m

Says it all really.

Our forwards don't do enough work. To win games you need multiple guys hitting over 100m in the forwards. One out running from the backs isn't going to win us shit.
 
Bloody hell , i got shot down because i bagged him for 78 m .
16m???? Anybody still want him as captain?
 
@InBenjiWeTrust said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211202) said:
@weststigerman said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211176) said:
Is that a record low metres gained for a starting prop?

Sadly, Matulino and Packer must be our worst props pair ever!

PaCKerlINo!
 
@69-05-41 said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211218) said:
Packer's stats are criminal. Must not be at WT's in 2021.

He should have been punted when he gave away three penalties, went to the bin and gotta suspended in 13 mins weeks ago.
 
@weststigerman said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211176) said:
Is that a record low metres gained for a starting prop?

Packer = 3 runs for 16 meters = 5.33 meters per run = catch the ball and fall over.
 
@gallagher said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211221) said:
@69-05-41 said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211218) said:
Packer's stats are criminal. Must not be at WT's in 2021.

He should have been punted when he gave away three penalties, went to the bin and gotta suspended in 13 mins weeks ago.

Some people actually praised him for that saying they liked his attitude.He came here as an overpaid imposter and will leave the same way but not soon enough
 
@jadtiger said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211233) said:
@gallagher said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211221) said:
@69-05-41 said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211218) said:
Packer's stats are criminal. Must not be at WT's in 2021.

He should have been punted when he gave away three penalties, went to the bin and gotta suspended in 13 mins weeks ago.

Some people actually praised him for that saying they liked his attitude.He came here as an overpaid imposter and will leave the same way but not soon enough

He'll suck up some call space, thanks Justin, but we won't have to watch him again.
 
@Lukic said in [Foxsports stats \- Tigers V Chooks](/post/1211187) said:
Packer: 3 runs for 16m

Says it all really.

Our forwards don't do enough work. To win games you need multiple guys hitting over 100m in the forwards. One out running from the backs isn't going to win us shit.

I have been in Packer's corner and supporting him...but he wanted absolutely none of the tough stuff today. Wanted none of JWH.

16 meters...honestly, any starting prop with that stat should put their hand up and retire immediately. I am decades older and have a stuffed back, but I'd have got 16 meters today.
 
Back
Top