Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340857) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit
It’s always been the same mate ..
If it was an 8 team comp Latrell could miss his next few games against us ..
But that ain’t happening.
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit
@elleryhanley said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340868) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit
Completely agree.
It is is of no benefit to us / the next 3-4 teams get the benefit.
How he was not binned for the Nofa elbow I have absolutely no idea.
Late...cocked his elbow...connected with the face.
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340862) said:@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340857) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit
It’s always been the same mate ..
If it was an 8 team comp Latrell could miss his next few games against us ..
But that ain’t happening.
It's never made sense to me. We literally got no benefit from Latrell being a grub but other teams do, seems so dumb.
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340870) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340862) said:@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340857) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit
It’s always been the same mate ..
If it was an 8 team comp Latrell could miss his next few games against us ..
But that ain’t happening.
It's never made sense to me. We literally got no benefit from Latrell being a grub but other teams do, seems so dumb.
Agree
But what other way is there ..
I missed his dog shot on Nofoaluma live but having seen the replays he should’ve been sent off imo
It never works out for West’s Tigers does it !
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game
Garner should have stayed down
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game
Garner should have stayed down
Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior
@wt2k said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340848) said:Just in: @SSFCRABBITOHS Latrell Mitchell facing three or four-game ban for high hit on David Nofoaluma and two $1600 fines for two incidents involving WestsTigers Luke Garner. Zane Musgrove free to play with fine for his high tackle. Full details on @NRLcom
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340882) said:@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game
Garner should have stayed down
Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior
Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised
Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340891) said:@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340882) said:@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game
Garner should have stayed down
Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior
Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised
Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us
Why would be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .
These are the 1% plays we suck at .
If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..
Then a Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340895) said:@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340891) said:@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340882) said:@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game
Garner should have stayed down
Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior
Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised
Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us
Why would be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .
These are the 1% plays we suck at .
If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..
Then a Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .
I’m taking the piss lol
Also Latrells foot was out , so it should never have got to the Garner stage anyway