Game Charges v Souths

hsvjones

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
4,486
So when do we hear the bad news that our players have been charged and will miss games but LM will be a small fine and slap on the wrist ??? Just need a energy boost so think this will do it perfectly :face_palm:
 
Just in: @SSFCRABBITOHS Latrell Mitchell facing three or four-game ban for high hit on David Nofoaluma and two $1600 fines for two incidents involving WestsTigers Luke Garner. Zane Musgrove free to play with fine for his high tackle. Full details on @NRLcom
 
The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit
 
Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game
 
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:
The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

It’s always been the same mate ..
If it was an 8 team comp Latrell could miss his next few games against us ..
But that ain’t happening.
 
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340857) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:
The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

It’s always been the same mate ..
If it was an 8 team comp Latrell could miss his next few games against us ..
But that ain’t happening.

It's never made sense to me. We literally got no benefit from Latrell being a grub but other teams do, seems so dumb.
 
Man the fact we didn't get an 8 point try is giving me the craps yet he gets fined for it later. Sutton and Perenara did us 0 favours last night
 
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:
The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

Completely agree.

It is is of no benefit to us / the next 3-4 teams get the benefit.

How he was not binned for the Nofa elbow I have absolutely no idea.

Late...cocked his elbow...connected with the face.
 
@elleryhanley said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340868) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:
The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

Completely agree.

It is is of no benefit to us / the next 3-4 teams get the benefit.

How he was not binned for the Nofa elbow I have absolutely no idea.

Late...cocked his elbow...connected with the face.

If it was Joey or JWH....
 
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340862) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340857) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:
The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

It’s always been the same mate ..
If it was an 8 team comp Latrell could miss his next few games against us ..
But that ain’t happening.

It's never made sense to me. We literally got no benefit from Latrell being a grub but other teams do, seems so dumb.

Agree
But what other way is there ..
I missed his dog shot on Nofoaluma live but having seen the replays he should’ve been sent off imo

It never works out for West’s Tigers does it !
 
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:
Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down
 
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340870) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340862) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340857) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340850) said:
The fact someone can get suspended for 3 games yet the team they did it against gets absolutely 0 benefit makes no sense. He needs to be binned or sent off. Instead the next 3 teams Souths play will benefit

It’s always been the same mate ..
If it was an 8 team comp Latrell could miss his next few games against us ..
But that ain’t happening.

It's never made sense to me. We literally got no benefit from Latrell being a grub but other teams do, seems so dumb.

Agree
But what other way is there ..
I missed his dog shot on Nofoaluma live but having seen the replays he should’ve been sent off imo

It never works out for West’s Tigers does it !

Needs to be binned at least!
 
Glad Zane ain't suspended. Was in beast mode when he came on
 
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:
Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior
 
I'm sure Graham head of refs will tell us they got it wrong 🙄
 
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:
Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us
 
@wt2k said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340848) said:
Just in: @SSFCRABBITOHS Latrell Mitchell facing three or four-game ban for high hit on David Nofoaluma and two $1600 fines for two incidents involving WestsTigers Luke Garner. Zane Musgrove free to play with fine for his high tackle. Full details on @NRLcom

Great. Talau gets sin binned for not being square at marker, but a 4 week ban incident is not enough for a WT penalty.
 
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340882) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:
Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us

Why would we be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .

These are the 1% plays we suck at .

If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..

Then Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .
 
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340891) said:
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340882) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:
Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us

Why would be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .

These are the 1% plays we suck at .

If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..

Then a Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .

I’m taking the piss lol

Also Latrells foot was out , so it should never have got to the Garner stage anyway
 
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340895) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340891) said:
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340882) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340878) said:
@speed2burn said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340872) said:
@jc99 said in [Game Charges v Souths](/post/1340853) said:
Also Latrell got charged for sliding in with the knees after Garner scored. That means we should've got an 8 point try which would've massively changed the game

Garner should have stayed down

Talau should’ve smashed Latrell in the in-goal... prior

Let’s be real ... we probably would have been penalised

Unbelievable how much they nitpicked us

Why would be penalised..
If Talau tackles Latrell in the in-goal the Kick out at Garner never eventuates .

These are the 1% plays we suck at .

If any player should have stayed down it should’ve been Nofoaluma..

Then a Latrell would’ve seen 10 in the bin ..
We need to play smarter .

I’m taking the piss lol

Also Latrells foot was out , so it should never have got to the Garner stage anyway

I know ...(piss)
I’m being realistic
His foot never went out

Talau stuffed up
 
Back
Top