Having (or not having) a Latrell

jirskyr

Well-known member
There was an interesting conversation behind us during the match on Friday night. A Roosters supporter was telling his Tigers mate how frustrating it is to be a Roosters fan with a player like Latrell, who at this stage of the match (around 50 minutes in) had done basically nothing and bludged on the sideline most of the game.

The fellow says: "If this was NFL I'd dead-set trade him for a more reliable player and a couple of early draft picks. I know he's potentially a great player but also he just seems disinterested sometimes and it annoys me."

10 minutes later and Latrell has set up one try and scored another, kicked all the goals and the Roosters retake the lead.

I turn around to the bloke and I say "would you be trading Latrell now?" He bloke just smiled and shrugged.

That was the difference between the two sides really on the night, though Keary also had some special touches, it appears Latrell can afford to just pick his moments, because he's near unstoppable when he gets properly involved. They dumped him from Origin I but I always maintain he's the kind of bloke you want on the field when you need a rapid change in fortunes.

Question is, for a struggling team like Tigers or Bulldogs, could you afford to go all-in for a Latrell-type player, knowing he might either get really lazy or break a game for you? Can Latrell do what he does in a lesser team?
 
In a heartbeat you would have Latrell Mitchell and proves Rorters fans are flogs so thank you for sharing..
 
Again unless you have a forward pack that can create space and halves that give him early ball it wouldn't matter
 
Expectations are different for supporters who support successful teams. They are a lot higher. What we would crawl over hot coals for, Roosters fans would shrug at. Kind of like a homeless person and what they’d give to sleep in a bed every night. Those of us that do don’t see it as a big deal.
 
@Spud_Murphy said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1031619) said:
A Latrell in the backs and a Pangai Jr in the forwards would complete our team beautifully, no question.


Yep agree. I posted last week that we are not too far away. This squad is proving to be decent - just lacking flair or X factor. A bit of pace and a game breaker and we are right up there.
One thing becoming very obvious is we have the right coach
 
When I read the title I thought, "Having a Latrell", was code for some form of bodily function.
 
That young centre Billy Smith in the North's team looked good. Apparently he was one of the best rugby talents when purchasing by the Roosters.
 
It all depends on what cost it would mean to the other 29 players in our roster.

What I mean is we would be forced probably to pay up to 50% over market value so that would mean we would have to make significant savings in other areas of the cap.

Anyway it’s not going to happen
 
In a way, Marsters is out Mitchell. A poor man's mitchell...
When he's on he looks great, but a lot of the time he meanders around. If he could run as hard as mitchell he'd be great!
 
@balmain-boy said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1031680) said:
In a way, Marsters is out Mitchell. A poor man's mitchell...
When he's on he looks great, but a lot of the time he meanders around. If he could run as hard as mitchell he'd be great!


Just thinking that last night..
 
@TieDye said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1031681) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1031680) said:
In a way, Marsters is out Mitchell. A poor man's mitchell...
When he's on he looks great, but a lot of the time he meanders around. If he could run as hard as mitchell he'd be great!


Just thinking that last night..

Thought he had a go last night, but agree 100% most games he walks into the defensive line and tries to wriggle free. Limited impact

He could learn something from nofo
 
A negative vote from me @jirskyr as he reminds me too much of The Hayne Plane. Either brilliant or terrible with nothing much more than his mind really not being in the game in between :skull_and_crossbones:
 

Well the day you turn down signing Latrell, I'll make sure to be elsewhere so I'm not embarrassed.
 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1/article/amp/nrl/nrl-premiership/teams/rabbitohs/itll-dull-his-effectiveness-joey-admits-concerns-over-latrell-fullback-move/news-story/eec3796f813dd5b3435735cc4227f6f9
 
@Demps said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1118165) said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1/article/amp/nrl/nrl-premiership/teams/rabbitohs/itll-dull-his-effectiveness-joey-admits-concerns-over-latrell-fullback-move/news-story/eec3796f813dd5b3435735cc4227f6f9

so he should

latrell finna be T H I C C C C C C C
 
**‘He’s not a fullback:’ Andrew Johns reveals big concern for Latrell Mitchell move.**

Latrell Mitchell is expected to line up for the Indigenous All Stars at fullback this weekend, but Andrew Johns says he’s making a mistake.

Mitchell switched from Bondi to Redfern this summer, with the sole motivator of his move appearing to revolve around his desire to play fullback.

The two-time premiership winner has often said the No. 1 spot is the one he grew up playing and knows best.

NSW coach Brad Fittler, who sat alongside Johns in the debate said he could see Mitchell making a success of the switch.

“He’s only been there back training for about a month, but he’s an out and out centre” Johns told WWOS.

‘He’s not a fullback, for me the workload of a fullback will dull his effectiveness.

“Fullbacks run probably twice as far and more intense than a centre.

“If I was coaching Latrell, I’d bring him into fullback in cameo roles, purely in attacking situations – dropouts or scrums or penalties.

“I just think coming out of his own half will be wasted doing a lot of that work around the middle of the field. He’s the best strike centre in the game.

“In the grand final, the Roosters are paddling, they’re going backwards, they give him the ball, flick pass, Tupou, Tedesco scores. Nobody else in the world can do that.”

Late last year, Fittler said: “There’s obviously challenges playing fullback.

“I’m gathering he’d have to get a little bit fitter and if you look at the ground they cover at the moment, fullbacks, it is a tough job.

“You wouldn’t go into that lightly.

“But you look at Greg Inglis, he’s not the most aerobically fit bloke.

“Jarryd Hayne, they all did really good jobs at fullback.

“He’ll make it his own if he ends up playing there, I’m sure.
 
@TheDaBoss said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1118173) said:
@Demps said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1118165) said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1/article/amp/nrl/nrl-premiership/teams/rabbitohs/itll-dull-his-effectiveness-joey-admits-concerns-over-latrell-fullback-move/news-story/eec3796f813dd5b3435735cc4227f6f9

so he should

latrell finna be T H I C C C C C C C

If by thic u mean fat...
Yes.

Lol.
 
@Demps said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1118176) said:
@TheDaBoss said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1118173) said:
@Demps said in [Having \(or not having\) a Latrell](/post/1118165) said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/coupler.foxsports.com.au/api/v1/article/amp/nrl/nrl-premiership/teams/rabbitohs/itll-dull-his-effectiveness-joey-admits-concerns-over-latrell-fullback-move/news-story/eec3796f813dd5b3435735cc4227f6f9

so he should

latrell finna be T H I C C C C C C C

If by thic u mean fat...
Yes.

Lol.

yes he is
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top