HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
All clubs need support the community. Parramatta, The Bulldogs, Saint George ect. HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.
I guess I'd rather be on the HBG board than the Parramatta Leagues board?

I DO NOT know the answer- putting that out there before I get attacked with it- but the 27,000 members for HBG. Is that Wests Tigers? Ashfield? APIA? All combined?

The 60,000 Canterbury Leagues club members- all Bulldogs? What other fan bases are included?

Not being funny- genuinely curious.
 
Apparently we had the best membership numbers & ran a profit, along with a better result on the field.

It doesn't look like we went backwards.

This year hasn't happened yet. If we go forward again- what happens?

The HBG pay rise is based on 2025 results, across all their spectrums, I would assume.
.

We sit under 10k and in the bottom 4 of members. Even Manly have more than double our membership.
 
.

We sit under 10k and in the bottom 4 of members. Even Manly have more than double our membership.
Comparing with a club that was formed 70 years ago & played in the finals twice in the last 5 years.

If the Tigers play finals this season- compare membership numbers next season. Not disregarding the comparison- we are way down on other clubs.
 
You're changing the goal posts.

HBG fund the operations that make money. Do the poker machines make money? Yes. Do HBG fund the operation of that? Yes. Should poker machine money be included as a result? Yes. Did Wests Tigers make money? Yes.

Their 'company' mantra is about funding junior sport/community. They have clearly done that.

"Do you also have any case studies on the broken homes and impacted families as a result of those losing their life savings too?"- I guess we can blame HBG for that- didn't give enough back in 2025.
Lets bring the goalposts back to the point we should be discussing then.

Did HBG blow up the wests tigers football club, one of their businesses, in December 2025? Yes.

Do wests tigers fans have a right to think its ludacris that these people deserve payrises? Yes.

Is it a suprise that the usual suspects across all social media platforms are trying to distance this subject from the football club, despite spending the last 3 months telling us they control us? No.

When it suited the narrative, they owned us.. now it doesnt suit it, what they do has nothing to do with us...
 
You know what’s annoying the same 4 people are literally the only people defending this . They never waiver, there’s never nuance or any offers of partisanship. It’s just defend, defend , defend .
It’s to this that you know these people are full of shit and just cheerleading .
Because everyone else goes in and out I’ve noticed . Sometimes on certain subjects they’re staunch anti HBG , yet on others they offer defence , and explanation , or at least apathy .
But the most frustrating thing . Is they frame people with opposing views as having agendas . When all they do is seek repeat , regurgitate the party line ad nauseam .
They won’t even concede the obvious that our governance on all levels has been a joke . My point in all this , is anyone who iis trying to determine what’s up and down in this mess , need only look at people who don’t have the answers. It’s to those people where you can find your North Star in all this .
If you’re a magpies supporter but you see the stench a mile away don’t get sucked into this Balmain v magpies horseshit . It’s all games to stop you questioning people friends and families about thier incompetence .
 
Lets bring the goalposts back to the point we should be discussing then.

Did HBG blow up the wests tigers football club, one of their businesses, in December 2025? Yes.

Do wests tigers fans have a right to think its ludacris that these people deserve payrises? Yes.

Is it a suprise that the usual suspects across all social media platforms are trying to distance this subject from the football club, despite spending the last 3 months telling us they control us? No.

When it suited the narrative, they owned us.. now it doesnt suit it, what they do has nothing to do with us...
Did HBG blow up the wests tigers football club, one of their businesses, in December 2025? Yes.
Some parts of the Wests Tigers board/leadership are not returning as a result of HBG decisions. Blow up the club though? Seems a little dramatic at this stage.

Do wests tigers fans have a right to think its ludacris that these people deserve payrises? Yes.
Absolutely! And more power to them! However, those SAME fans have a right not NOT think it's ludicrous and suggest otherwise- so long as it is done respectfully.

Is it a suprise that the usual suspects across all social media platforms are trying to distance this subject from the football club, despite spending the last 3 months telling us they control us? No.
Going to admit- not sure what this is referring to. What is being distanced? The HBG board & Wests Tigers board? Is this forum the social media you're referring to?

Assuming that is what you refer to- then it's yes/no. I can see why people get whipped out of shape at the moment. This board is just waiting on the 'next thing' they can blame HBG for. And in a debate, there should be 2 sides presented. Does HBG 'own' Wests Tigers. Yeah, kind of. Does HBG board member pay increases affect Wests Tigers? No. Are pay increases for HBG board members unheard of/unbelievable? I doubt it. Do I think they deserve them? No idea. I just assume they are based on meeting certain achievements over 2025.
 
You know what’s annoying the same 4 people are literally the only people defending this . They never waiver, there’s never nuance or any offers of partisanship. It’s just defend, defend , defend .
It’s to this that you know these people are full of shit and just cheerleading .
Because everyone else goes in and out I’ve noticed . Sometimes on certain subjects they’re staunch anti HBG , yet on others they offer defence , and explanation , or at least apathy .
But the most frustrating thing . Is they frame people with opposing views as having agendas . When all they do is seek repeat , regurgitate the party line ad nauseam .
They won’t even concede the obvious that our governance on all levels has been a joke . My point in all this , is anyone who iis trying to determine what’s up and down in this mess , need only look at people who don’t have the answers. It’s to those people where you can find your North Star in all this .
If you’re a magpies supporter but you see the stench a mile away don’t get sucked into this Balmain v magpies horseshit . It’s all games to stop you questioning people friends and families about thier incompetence .

Bingo bingo bingo.

I just want to double down on one thing you mention and thats the Magpie Balmain stuff. Its been said many many times, but a few dont seem to get it. They are letting abnormal paranoia cloud their thinking.

THERE IS NO MAGPIE AND BALMAIN ISSUE. THERE IS ONLY A MAGPIE AND WESTS TIGERS ISSUE.

Why anyone wants to support the Pies over the Wests Tigers ill never know. No offence to the history of the Pies, I love the Maggie's. But this is 2026. Get on board or piss off
 
This board is just waiting on the 'next thing' they can blame HBG for.
HBG were not a topic all year until they almost destroyed the club in december.

The fact you think ppl sit here and wait for 'the next thing we can blame hbg for' demonstrates your complete disconnect with the reality of the situation with the fans of the wests tigers nrl club.
 
Bingo bingo bingo.

I just want to double down on one thing you mention and thats the Magpie Balmain stuff. Its been said many many times, but a few dont seem to get it. They are letting abnormal paranoia cloud their thinking.

THERE IS NO MAGPIE AND BALMAIN ISSUE. THERE IS ONLY A MAGPIE AND WESTS TIGERS ISSUE.

Why anyone wants to support the Pies over the Wests Tigers ill never know. No offence to the history of the Pies, I love the Maggie's. But this is 2026. Get on board or piss off
The problem with saying piss off to magpies and balmain loyalists , is they use it as “see they don’t want us … I knew it “ . So the loop begins again .
For me i think whe should be using wordage like ; wests tigers are the future . If you don’t want to support wests tigers .. then please support your foundation club of choice ….. but stay out of wests tigers politics .
As I think that sums up the situation perfectly .
 
Did HBG blow up the wests tigers football club, one of their businesses, in December 2025? Yes.
Some parts of the Wests Tigers board/leadership are not returning as a result of HBG decisions. Blow up the club though? Seems a little dramatic at this stage.

Do wests tigers fans have a right to think its ludacris that these people deserve payrises? Yes.
Absolutely! And more power to them! However, those SAME fans have a right not NOT think it's ludicrous and suggest otherwise- so long as it is done respectfully.

Is it a suprise that the usual suspects across all social media platforms are trying to distance this subject from the football club, despite spending the last 3 months telling us they control us? No.
Going to admit- not sure what this is referring to. What is being distanced? The HBG board & Wests Tigers board? Is this forum the social media you're referring to?

Assuming that is what you refer to- then it's yes/no. I can see why people get whipped out of shape at the moment. This board is just waiting on the 'next thing' they can blame HBG for. And in a debate, there should be 2 sides presented. Does HBG 'own' Wests Tigers. Yeah, kind of. Does HBG board member pay increases affect Wests Tigers? No. Are pay increases for HBG board members unheard of/unbelievable? I doubt it. Do I think they deserve them? No idea. I just assume they are based on meeting certain achievements over 2025.
That's enough out of you for one day
 
The problem with saying piss off to magpies and balmain loyalists , is they use it as “see they don’t want us … I knew it “ . So the loop begins again .
For me i think whe should be using wordage like ; wests tigers are the future . If you don’t want to support wests tigers .. then please support your foundation club of choice ….. but stay out of wests tigers politics .
As I think that sums up the situation perfectly .

I get your point, but seriously, do we need to tippy toe around like that? We probably do unfortunately
 
You know what’s annoying the same 4 people are literally the only people defending this . They never waiver, there’s never nuance or any offers of partisanship. It’s just defend, defend , defend .
It’s to this that you know these people are full of shit and just cheerleading .
Because everyone else goes in and out I’ve noticed . Sometimes on certain subjects they’re staunch anti HBG , yet on others they offer defence , and explanation , or at least apathy .
But the most frustrating thing . Is they frame people with opposing views as having agendas . When all they do is seek repeat , regurgitate the party line ad nauseam .
They won’t even concede the obvious that our governance on all levels has been a joke . My point in all this , is anyone who iis trying to determine what’s up and down in this mess , need only look at people who don’t have the answers. It’s to those people where you can find your North Star in all this .
If you’re a magpies supporter but you see the stench a mile away don’t get sucked into this Balmain v magpies horseshit . It’s all games to stop you questioning people friends and families about thier incompetence .
I'm going to assume I'm one of the 4.
They won’t even concede the obvious that our governance on all levels has been a joke .

Wests Tigers, historically (and definitely most recently) have not been run very well.

Where the blame is placed is open to conjecture. I know where the group want to point- that's ok. It's also ok to think differently.

To the point of HBG, and the "HBGout"-think, this is where I, personally, 100% disagree.

HBG should be encouraged to be involved. Worked with. Even....respected for what they DO actually do.

I do not believe they are 100% the reason for 3 wooden spoons, which does appear to be one of the defining failures of their regime.

If I have not acknowledged any point I agree with made by others (I thought I had made an effort), I'll try harder.

The aggression, for lack of a better word, directed toward those that do not agree with the masses, can make one feel a little....how shall I say...defensive? Might influence the way responses come back.

Outside of one or two people, I've tried to respond when something is directed my way. I hope you feel your point is received.

Also- when I say "I don't know", I mean- I don't know. It's not a diversion. I didn't realise the board contained so many people that 'know'.
 
I'm going to assume I'm one of the 4.
They won’t even concede the obvious that our governance on all levels has been a joke .

Wests Tigers, historically (and definitely most recently) have not been run very well.

Where the blame is placed is open to conjecture. I know where the group want to point- that's ok. It's also ok to think differently.

To the point of HBG, and the "HBGout"-think, this is where I, personally, 100% disagree.

HBG should be encouraged to be involved. Worked with. Even....respected for what they DO actually do.

I do not believe they are 100% the reason for 3 wooden spoons, which does appear to be one of the defining failures of their regime.

If I have not acknowledged any point I agree with made by others (I thought I had made an effort), I'll try harder.

The aggression, for lack of a better word, directed toward those that do not agree with the masses, can make one feel a little....how shall I say...defensive? Might influence the way responses come back.

Outside of one or two people, I've tried to respond when something is directed my way. I hope you feel your point is received.

Also- when I say "I don't know", I mean- I don't know. It's not a diversion. I didn't realise the board contained so many people that 'know'.

Chad you win. You are right, there is nothing HBG have done to warrant any of us fans to doubt them. They have earned the right to be given the benefit of the doubt in every single aspect. You have said it enough now, albeit with zero proof, that I believe it.

Give em a chance people, they haven't been given a fair go.
 
HBG were not a topic all year until they almost destroyed the club in december.

The fact you think ppl sit here and wait for 'the next thing we can blame hbg for' demonstrates your complete disconnect with the reality of the situation with the fans of the wests tigers nrl club.
I see your point.

To counterbalance that- what has happened since December that has made you feel like we are going backwards? (ie- since the board/Richo departure- what has HBG/Wests Tigers done to make you fear things are going backwards)
 
Chad you win. You are right, there is nothing HBG have done to warrant any of us fans to doubt them. They have earned the right to be given the benefit of the doubt in every single aspect. You have said it enough now, albeit with zero proof, that I believe it.

Give em a chance people, they haven't been given a fair go.
Nah mate- you take the win.

It's better if we all just agree. This way we can have 4 more pitchforks at the next rally.
 
Back
Top