HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Maybe they have too much on their plate.. a good indicator is PVL involvement

They should divest the nrl club and focus somewhere else...
The only thing they should have on their plate is food and a care giver to feed them because it is clear that many of them may have dementia and would be incapable of looking after themselves.

What they should focus on is finding a good nursing home where they can be looked after 24/7 and leave the running of the Wests Tigers to a board that is competent and suitably qualified to perform that task.
 
If you’re conceding that statement as a truism , you’re clearly not one of the 4 mate .
Rational debate is not what I’m talking about . Offering alternative thoughts and finding different ways to think about things has never been the issue . Especially when it begins from a place where common sense begins ie. wests tigers governance is a circus ! Always has been .
If you’re willing to concede that ,which you are , like I said it would be hypocritical of me to say I’m trying to find common ground when I reject a well thought out alternate argument .
The issue is clear diversion tactics , attempts at re routing the conversation to be about wests v Balmain , and faux outrage to gain sympathy and then shift . Which as much as I disagree with you . You’re not one of those . You just have a different opinion . And that’s ok . You seem willing to break bread though . Which was my whole point.
Thank you Sir.

I know I go against the common thought- and I'm ok with that. I think everyone should be heard.

Until they cross the line into disrespect & abuse.
 
mud map figures have hbg in2025 with a 100 million turn over ,11% profit of 11.1 mill
Total put back into the community was 3.2 mill, roughly 23 %, with half of that going to the WestTigers
Why are they siting on such a large amount of cash?
400, thou was shared amongst the junior clubs , 130 went to Croydon bowls for upkeep,wow
12 500 to Pratten Park Magpies , is that a breeding program or some sort of team
300 thou in club grants in kind unspecified- cat 3 , id start looking there
 
Depending on the date they were inducted- might just be timing.
We’re waiting on the board announcement, Bula’s contract status, Bird’s release, nothing to say if Bunty has been upgraded, no confirmation about Vegas, Terrell’s extension has been forgotten about and we kick off in 6 days. What have they been doing
 
mud map figures have hbg in2025 with a 100 million turn over ,12% profit of 11.1 mill
Total put back into the community was 3.2 mill, roughly 23 %, with half of that going to the WestTigers
Why are they siting on such a large amount of cash?
400, thou was shared amongst the junior clubs , 130 went to Croydon bowls for upkeep,wow
12 500 to Pratten Park Magpies , is that a breeding program or some sort of team
300 thou in club grants in kind unspecified- cat 3 , id start looking there
Where was the 12% profit stated? I missed that.


Dare I say- $11.1m in profit sounds pretty handy... not at all incompetent... 😛
 
Thank you Sir.

I know I go against the common thought- and I'm ok with that. I think everyone should be heard.

Until they cross the line into disrespect & abuse.
Mate I’ve read your posts , and I’ve never heard reference to wests or Balmain outside of anecdotally . Because that shit is a red herring , and a complete waste of time .
I see you defend the HBG actions because you seem to take thier actions on face value ie. they saw issues and corrected those issues . Where as the rest of us , see a long history of “I see a threat to my position , I’m going to eliminate said threat “.
But to fair you are right , there are new names and faces on the HBG board , and I’ve been first to concede sometimes it just takes a different voice in the room , to shift things . I’m hoping that’s the case , and you’re right all the problems have been sorted and all this negative HBG press is flogging a dead horse .
I do have question though . Where did the leak for this pay rise come from?

Just as a side note ; I was very critical of Darcy Byrne when he came out and used ticket prices at LO as an excuse to stick the boot into HBG. For me , I saw that as grandstanding and using the wests tigers to leverage people , and get the outrage machine going . Only using the wests tigers as collateral damage . Seemed self serving , and prettt shitful behaviour to me .
 
We’re waiting on the board announcement, Bula’s contract status, Bird’s release, nothing to say if Bunty has been upgraded, no confirmation about Vegas, Terrell’s extension has been forgotten about and we kick off in 6 days. What have they been doing
Now being fair- a lot of that would come from the CEO as the board don't negotiate contracts.
 
I wouldn't- if they directed the comment in that way.

They said that the Wests Tigers board wasn't working in 'some areas' & was removed as a result. They didn't point the finger at any individual & say "there's the culprit".

It sounded more like HBG didn't feel the way the board was operating fit with what they expected.

As an aside- with the 'new board'- how many old board members stay on without being re-selected? The HBG guys were replaced, weren't they?
So when they only remove the independent directors but leave the ownership representatives, would that not point the finger?
 
Now being fair- a lot of that would come from the CEO as the board don't negotiate contracts.
Maybe . Not if the hold up is board approval . That was one of the constitutional issues that Richo wanted to change . Player signings that didn’t have to go to the board for approval .
 
FWIW this is regarding the HBG board NOT the Wests Tigers board. Who cares about what they pay themselves on the HBG board really!
Technically it is tge Wests Tigers board as they are the majority now. Though i doubt the ridicule is due to the actual ammount of money but more that the HBG believe they are entitled to a payrise making them the highest paid board of an N.R.L team "owner". After all the chaos theyve caused and failure at N.R.L level theyve overseen since becoming majority "owners". True it is the HBG board though now they are in the majority on the Wests Tigers board, they are one and the same imo. Not to mention the constant game of thrones thats happening in the boardroom, its proof of how out of touch, delusional and untouchable they are.
 
We’re waiting on the board announcement, Bula’s contract status, Bird’s release, nothing to say if Bunty has been upgraded, no confirmation about Vegas, Terrell’s extension has been forgotten about and we kick off in 6 days. What have they been doing
Birds release hasn't been announced because if we do announce it after round 1 he can be included in our top 30 for 2026 and we don't need to replace him.
 
I can't say. Don't know for sure- I assume to try & make sense of it before the media turned it into something else?

I don't know why HBG have done a lot of things. But until we do- I think we should hear it all out before storming the Bastille. Or, if we NEVER hear it out- judge them on the results of the changes.
Simplify it further.

The purpose of the press release was to update fans and stakeholders on significant changes impacting the wests tigers football club. Paton basically said this himself in the statement (im not going back to watch it again).

Since that press release:
- the ceo resigned
- hbg met with PVL
- the board members were invited to return
- an interim ceo has been appointed

So if paton was being truthful about keeping everyone updated, they would have made another statement given the raft of significant changes that have taken place.

Professional organisations communicate. Lets use big technology companies as an example. They get on the front foot every time they have a tech failure or network outage; they own their mistakes.

Weak organisations hide in the shadows and blame others.

HBG's lack of communication indicates they never actually cared about the wests tigers fans and that they only made the statement to protect their own self interest.
 
Mate I’ve read your posts , and I’ve never heard reference to wests or Balmain outside of anecdotally . Because that shit is a red herring , and a complete waste of time .
I see you defend the HBG actions because you seem to take thier actions on face value ie. they saw issues and corrected those issues . Where as the rest of us , see a long history of “I see a threat to my position , I’m going to eliminate said threat “.
But to fair you are right , there are new names and faces on the HBG board , and I’ve been first to concede sometimes it just takes a different voice in the room , to shift things . I’m hoping that’s the case , and you’re right all the problems have been sorted and all this negative HBG press is flogging a dead horse .
I do have question though . Where did the leak for this pay rise come from?

Just as a side note ; I was very critical of Darcy Byrne when he came out and used ticket prices at LO as an excuse to stick the boot into HBG. For me , I saw that as grandstanding and using the wests tigers to leverage people , and get the outrage machine going . Only using the wests tigers as collateral damage . Seemed self serving , and prettt shitful behaviour to me .
I have no idea how the new pay rise leak came out. I do suspect that the article was written & released very specifically to fuel the anti-HBG fire.

360 on Fox proved something to me years ago- Wests Tigers fan base pays attention to the media & CAN get caught up in the hysteria. That show THRIVED on Wests Tigers fans lapping up information & being set forth like an angry mob.

As a result, I've tried really hard to not react when Wests Tigers news comes out- because a lot of it is rage baiting the masses. Which is why I was critical of the rally- totally based off a few opinions (some educated) but a lot from media reports. Darcy Do Little should get a gig on 360.

I want Wests Tigers to succeed.

I just don't believe 90% of what the media tells me. Until then- I'll take face value & make my own decisions.
 
Mate I’ve read your posts , and I’ve never heard reference to wests or Balmain outside of anecdotally . Because that shit is a red herring , and a complete waste of time .
I see you defend the HBG actions because you seem to take thier actions on face value ie. they saw issues and corrected those issues . Where as the rest of us , see a long history of “I see a threat to my position , I’m going to eliminate said threat “.
But to fair you are right , there are new names and faces on the HBG board , and I’ve been first to concede sometimes it just takes a different voice in the room , to shift things . I’m hoping that’s the case , and you’re right all the problems have been sorted and all this negative HBG press is flogging a dead horse .
I do have question though . Where did the leak for this pay rise come from?

Just as a side note ; I was very critical of Darcy Byrne when he came out and used ticket prices at LO as an excuse to stick the boot into HBG. For me , I saw that as grandstanding and using the wests tigers to leverage people , and get the outrage machine going . Only using the wests tigers as collateral damage . Seemed self serving , and prettt shitful behaviour to me .
Agree with all that mate.
 
So when they only remove the independent directors but leave the ownership representatives, would that not point the finger?
It could look that way. I think the new board make-up would tell a more fulfilled story on where they hold whatever blame they had.
 
Back
Top