Again, that is possible.
The 'complaints' levelled at the very beginning of the whole mess by HBG were about transparency on some business level decisions. They ousted board members.
Those board members are reinstated after PVL intervention, and they agree to come back.
But PVL also spoke to HBG, so he must have heard about their complaint as well.
Richo was integral to gaining investment & organising stadium agreements.
Is it possible HBG believed the board had been involved, but got that wrong & were convinced to take them back- but the blame of the complaint has now been shifted toward Richo?
There is still the shadow of the investigation on Richo, despite everyone believing it's a trumped up charge.
For mine- and I'm just looking at it from what is happening- I can see a possibility that PVL agreed that HBG should have had more say & could understand where the conflict comes from.
Everyone is convinced this is about board control.
The only thing we KNOW from HBG is that they complained they were not consulted on business decisions.
Board control- their desire for it- is something we are willing to believe, but it's still speculation.