HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

They have proven very recently that’s not acceptable to HBG
They have proven that an independent board is not acceptable - but until we know the makeup of the new board we don't know if the selection of candidates against the skills matrix has been done. If they have the right skills and attitude I really don't care if they are HBG or independent. If the "pool of talent" is only debenture holders then we probably have an issue to contend with.

HBG's previous behaviour indicates that it will be jobs for the blazer brigade; however, I trust that the NRL has issued some clear guidance that will have them more focussed on results than and another blazer and free meals for the debenture holders.

It is their toy set, I hope we see them put more of the broken toys like Burgess aside.
 
They have proven that an independent board is not acceptable - but until we know the makeup of the new board we don't know if the selection of candidates against the skills matrix has been done. If they have the right skills and attitude I really don't care if they are HBG or independent.
💯 This is the only way to go imo. A skilled board will not get every call right but odds are more in their favour for it to happen

Need to remove the us and them narrative
 
One of the few that's looking at it without bias.
The Chads general claim that no one knows exactly what transpired so interpreting events in a way that casts negative light on HBG, apart from a few concessions, is invalid; is a diversionary tactic used when there’s no substantive defence to an accusation.

This is a forum where people express their opinions yet The Chad appears to seek empirical evidence rather than accept logic to support or refute claims. He sets the bar so high that no one is able to reach it and as a result positions himself as unbiased.

It’s a construct which defines all accusations against HGB as invalid, in this scenario, HBG are the winners.

The Chad is one of the most bias posters on the forum.
 
Back
Top