HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Just a fair argument is all.

People want to paint HBG as evil. (Not intended to point out anyone in particular). I don't see it. Self interested? Probably. But find me any business that isn't.

They could have punted the Balmain half. Manly did it. Illawarra basically was obliterated.

But they didn't.
Completely fair mate. Agree that they're not evil.

If I was in their seat, I would have let balmain go, but they did something honourable.

But there are a lot of community organisations that aren't based on self-interest, but a leagues club is a bit different.

Just hope the backlash was a wakeup call.
 
Last edited:
They should absolutely be funding their own. The post said they haven't stayed the course in 10 years on anything. They have no obligation to fund Balmain, for example.

All I'm saying is- if you want to stick knives in them for the failings, what they have done should also be acknowledged.
Balmain juniors are wests tigers juniors, right? So what is this crap that they don't have an obligation to them?

You cant use the "they own the club" argument on one hand, then say they have no obligation to its juniors on the other hand.

Enough of this BS mate.

If they are Wests Tigers focused, then they 100% have an obligation to its juniors.
 
Last edited:
I don't see a reason a powerful Wests Tigers can't be made up by the foundations of two well funded 'feeder clubs/joint venture clubs' in Wests Magpies & Balmain.

Whoever is put on a Wests Tigers board should have the good of both JV clubs, and Wests Tigers, as the agenda.

The whole idea of the merger, the joint venture, wasn't to eradicate two clubs. It was to SAVE them.

Manly & Norths stuffed it up. St George swallowed Illawarra.

I want our JV to be the shining light on how it SHOULD work.

I'm a long term Balmain Tigers fan. I don't want to see that club obliterated.

But I'm ALSO a Wests Tigers fan- and that is the future.

You can still focus on a future while incorporating the past.

And Wests Ashfield/HBG should be a good guide to any potential investor into a Balmain club. Money can be made in these clubs. It's an investment opportunity.

Remember- Laundy is a Balmain fan.

Triggeboff is a Balmain fan.

Why not sell the idea of hotel sites, clubs, pubs under a Balmain brand, with a 50% share of Wests Tigers, board room positions, an NRL licence...

How many NRL teams are up for sale? If a rich investor wanted in to the NRL- is there an easier path than through Balmain Tigers?

What about....a crowd funded buy-out of Balmain Tigers? Fan owned. You want to be a part of Wests Tigers? Board positions?

I am absolutely NOT advocating the return of failed Balmain board members. Whoever takes that over needs to be smart & full of ideas.

I'm 100% behind an actual JV though.
Balmain has no way to generate any income to fund an NRL team.
 
Imagine owning a Leagues club in Rozelle, maybe a hotel attached, having 3 seats on an NRL club board, access to an NRL licence...junior leagues running your colours...

If you were/are a Balmain tragic, why WOULDN"T it be an attractive thought?

If fans can organise a "HBG Out" rally in days, why can't that same level of enthusiasm be put toward a club revival? A stronger outcome for the club that we support (Wests Tigers).

You've already got Laundy, a Balmain fan, Triggeboff, a Balmain fan, Darcy Do-Little & Barry O'Farrell with their political connections, Benny, for all his faults, 15,000 fans (or whatever membership numbers Wests Tigers have)....even good old Lee is a Balmain fan in the business of investing in sporting teams...
HBG will own the Leagues Club in Balmain.
 
Balmain juniors are wests tigers juniors, right? So what is this crap that they don't have an obligation to them?

You cant use the "they own the club" argument on one hand, then say they have no obligation to its juniors on the other hand.

Enough of this BS mate.

If they are Wests Tigers focused, then they 100% have an obligation to its juniors.
They could have let Balmain wither & die & support all Wests junior leagues & still done their contribution to Wests Tigers.
 
Are you sure the NRL owns the brand name "West Tigers"?

I think this would be owned by Wests Tigers Football Club Pty Ltd, and they currently own/hold a licence to compete in the NRL.
The Wests Tigers heritage deed is a binding agreement, in place until at least 2030, that prohibits changing the club’s name or mascot, regardless of who the owners are.

My understanding is the ARLC will not allow breaking of the heritage deed, thus protecting the Wests Tigers name and mascot.
 
Last edited:
Ownership ModelDescriptionExamples
Member-OwnedMembers elect boards; community-driven governanceTraditional Sydney clubs
Privately OwnedOwned by individuals/corporationsStorm, Warriors, Titans
Publicly ListedShares traded on stock exchangeBrisbane Broncos
Leagues Club-Owned (NFP)Owned by not‑for‑profit leagues clubsSharks, Cowboys, Eels
Hybrid OwnershipMix of private and member/leagues club ownershipRabbitohs, Dragons
Government/ARLC OwnershipRare special-purpose ownershipPNG Chiefs
1. Member-Owned Clubs
These clubs are owned collectively by their financial members, who typically have voting rights and influence over governance.

Members elect boards and help guide club direction.
This model reflects the historical roots of rugby league as a community-based sport.

Source: Member-owned clubs are described as a primary NRL ownership model.

2. Privately Owned Clubs
Clubs are owned by individuals, corporations, or investment groups. These owners provide capital, strategic direction, and governance.
Examples include:

Melbourne Storm – owned by private investors.
New Zealand Warriors – owned by Autex Industries.



3. Publicly Listed Clubs
A rare model in Australian sport. Shares in the club are traded on the stock market, allowing public investment.
Example:

Brisbane Broncos, the only NRL club listed on the ASX.



4. Leagues Club-Owned (Not-for-Profit Ownership)
Many traditional NRL clubs are owned by large registered Leagues Clubs—hospitality/gaming venues that reinvest profits into sports operations.
Characteristics:

Clubs operate on a not‑for‑profit basis.
Revenue comes from gaming, hospitality, and membership rather than private equity.

Examples:

Cronulla‑Sutherland Sharks
North Queensland Cowboys
Parramatta Eels



5. Hybrid Ownership Models
A mix of private ownership and member/club ownership.
Examples include:

South Sydney Rabbitohs → 75% privately owned (Crowe/Packer/M Cannon‑Brookes group), 25% member-owned.
St George Illawarra Dragons → 50% WIN Corporation, 50% St George Leagues Club.


6. Government or Commission-Linked Ownership (Rare)
Some expansion clubs or special cases may involve ownership stakes by governing bodies.
Example:

Papua New Guinea Chiefs – jointly owned by the ARLC and Australian Government.
Thanks mate,

Good info.

With the privately owned clubs, there is a lot at stake. Owners benefit from the Club doing good so they are more likely to invest.

NFP Is interesting, is these teams have had their struggles like us.

Are we in the community driven bracket?

I Wonder who benefits from us doing well. In the model we have, I can't see anyone benefitting if we do well.
 
HBG will own the Leagues Club in Balmain.
Only if they redeveloped it . Balmain are on life support after having hbg consume their debt and handing over any so called assets in the deal .
They picked the worst club, cafe at the Flemington Markets that had a legit turnover.
Same political mob that twisted the Dogs over Liverpool , did the same a decade later at the Roselle site ,while that was going on{1of those pollies} made his way onto our board ,pushing to buy out the Liverpool site ,
He ended up doing time for dodgy water dealings in qld with the chinese , and most of the others tangled up with the Balmain site did time also for long term corruption NSW politics
 
Balmain juniors are wests tigers juniors, right? So what is this crap that they don't have an obligation to them?

You cant use the "they own the club" argument on one hand, then say they have no obligation to its juniors on the other hand.

Enough of this BS mate.

If they are Wests Tigers focused, then they 100% have an obligation to

Feeding off that argument ...

And having been created back in 1955 to support the Western Suburbs Magpies, they also have an obligation to 100% support the Magpies at the highest level available to them (aka NSW Cup level) 👍
 
Feeding off that argument ...

And having been created back in 1955 to support the Western Suburbs Magpies, they also have an obligation to 100% support the Magpies at the highest level available to them (aka NSW Cup level) 👍
No issues with them supporting the nsw cup team... however I think the nsw cup should be wests tigers to help create clearer pathways, not wests magpies. But we can share a different opinion thats fine
 
Back
Top