gallagher
Well-known member
When asked a question by the media you tend to answer the question.It also means it wasnt true either, does it?
I highly doubt PVL brings up the magpies based on the thoughts of a few podcasters.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When asked a question by the media you tend to answer the question.It also means it wasnt true either, does it?
I highly doubt PVL brings up the magpies based on the thoughts of a few podcasters.
The ones that got sacked. Plus Galea and/or John Coates if we could get him.Who would be a good fit for us?
Ok. Is it your opinion that discussions about bringing the magpies have not taken place at HBG over the last couple of years and that the people who have gone on record and implied it publicly are making it up?When asked a question by the media you tend to answer the question.
BEWARE: Big scary Magpie's lurk in the shadows and just when you least expect it - they'll jump out and laugh at all your crazy nonsense ...Ok. Is it your opinion that discussions about bringing the magpies have not taken place at HBG over the last couple of years and that the people who have gone on record and implied it publicly are making it up?
Isn't it arvo nap time mateBEWARE: Big scary Magpie's lurk in the shadows and just when you least expect it - they'll jump out and laugh at all your crazy nonsense ...
'Making it up' & 'exaggerating the story' are not the same thing.Ok. Is it your opinion that discussions about bringing the magpies have not taken place at HBG over the last couple of years and that the people who have gone on record and implied it publicly are making it up?
You are so quick to defend HBG and "question the group think" in the face of facts, yet you don't extend the same courtesy or the same consistency in your logic when it comes to other people like Lee.'Making it up' & 'exaggerating the story' are not the same thing.
As a fan base, we need to stop using anything Lee H says as 'facts' as his stories are being used inconsistently. For years anything Lee said was laughed at as "Lee being Lee- chasing ambulances etc".
We can't then turn around & use "well Lee said it so it must be true" as a fact when collectively we dismissed 90% of his comments when it didn't suit the argument.
Lee H comments should be given as much credence as Ben Elias comments.
And yes, I realise that some posters on here are claiming to have heard similar statements etc.
Lol, one too many Resches silver bullets at the Lidcombe Oval sausage sizzles.You are so quick to defend HBG and "question the group think" in the face of facts, yet you don't extend the same courtesy or the same consistency in your logic when it comes to other people like Lee.
How do you know Lee is not telling the truth? Were you there? If you weren't, then how can you be sure?
My view is you try to sound intelligent, but you don't actually realise with each post you look more and more foolish and intellectually dishonest.
You should just stop for your own reputation. Whatever is left of it.
Lee was the clubs chairman and was privy to information that most on here were not. Benny is nothing but a former player with some connections, he wasnt privy to the dealings within the club. You cannot place these two people in the same category.'Making it up' & 'exaggerating the story' are not the same thing.
As a fan base, we need to stop using anything Lee H says as 'facts' as his stories are being used inconsistently. For years anything Lee said was laughed at as "Lee being Lee- chasing ambulances etc".
We can't then turn around & use "well Lee said it so it must be true" as a fact when collectively we dismissed 90% of his comments when it didn't suit the argument.
Lee H comments should be given as much credence as Ben Elias comments.
So you acknowledge there is a theme here. Generally where there is smoke there is fire.And yes, I realise that some posters on here are claiming to have heard similar statements etc.
Lee was Chairman, not CEO, but from now on Chairman will be known as CEO, so now you are correct. Lee was CEO.Lee was the clubs CEO and was privy to information that most on here were not. Benny is nothing but a former player with some connections, he wasnt privy to the dealings within the club. You cannot place these two people in the same category.
So you acknowledge there is a theme here. Generally where there is smoke there is fire.
Why is it so hard for people to concede that there MAY have been a faction within the group who had this agenda? For anyone whos ever been around football clubs and old heads, its by no means far fetched.
Anyway, whatever. Game is on tonight.
Sorry it's my first week back at work after some leave and im trying to multitask haha mind is elsewhereLee was Chairman, not CEO, but from now on Chairman will be known as CEO, so now you are correct. Lee was CEO.