Holden Cup

@happy tiger said:
@pHyR3 said:
true true, just don't think the NRL will drop it to 6\. 8 is what i think we'll see, and hope we see AT A MINIMUM. 6 would probably be better, we'd probably benefit quite a lot from it too i think. If we can get some consistency and cohesion in our team.

From what I remember reading 8 will be the initial figure and it will drop from there

I would follow the AFL's lead for a permanent replacement for serious injuries

Do you mean like an 18th man that can come on or a free interchange?
 
@southerntiger said:
@pHyR3 said:
That's because those 3 are not very likely to have a future at the Tigers unfortunately. Rowe might…. but the rest will end up at another club im pretty sure.

Rowe might have to do a reverse GI, FB -centre.

No its because they all arent quite good enough. Rowe is too small for the modern game, Rudolph is solid but pedestrian and Mulcachy can only play one side.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I give Rowe some chance of playing a fair bit of NRL.
I also rate Cherrington, another year in NYC hopefully he continues to improve.
I agree Mulcahy is no chance and I think Rudolph is unlikely to play much.
 
@pHyR3 said:
do you reckon 6 or 8 interchanges and why? I don't want the game to become completely dominated by small players. Guys like Fifita and Burgesses still need an opportunity to shine.

Mate, I might we a dinosaur, but 'back in the day' the big blokes had to play for the full 80 minutes. There were only 2 reserves allowed, and they had to have played half a game in reserve grade first. There were plenty of stars - Beetson, O'neill, Sattler. It was a war of attrition and yes, it allowed the smaller blokes a bit more of a go later in the halves. Ahhh - the good old days :sunglasses:
 
Back
Top